ref(wsgi): Update _werkzeug vendor to newer version

[mgaligniana]

Fixes GH-3516

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 44.44444% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.41%. Comparing base (5a122b5) to head (ba2c350).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
sentry_sdk/_werkzeug.py	44.44%	11 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #4793 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 84.47% 83.41% -1.07%  ========================================== Files 158 158 Lines 16506 16512 +6 Branches 2865 2864 -1 ========================================== - Hits 13944 13773 -171  - Misses 1712 1889 +177  Partials 850 850 

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
sentry_sdk/_werkzeug.py	54.54% <44.44%> (+6.39%)	⬆️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

[sentrivana]

Thanks for the PR @mgaligniana -- I think the HTTP_X_FORWARDED_HOST handling needs to be added manually on top of the vendored in code. As far as I can tell we also did that in the current version as the original upstream 1.0.1 version also doesn't contain it.

[mgaligniana]

Ok, Seer 🎉 liked!

But codecov not, should I add new tests for the new vendor?

Edited: I think yes because Anton said:

Also make sure this code is tested to have a high test coverage. (maybe by vendoring in the related tests from Werkzeug?)

But do you think I should copy-paste the test from werkzeug to get_host for example?

[sentrivana]

But do you think I should copy-paste the test from werkzeug to get_host for example?

Tests would be great. I think the one you linked would be good, plus something custom for the HTTP_X_FORWARDED_HOST stuff.

[mgaligniana]

So adding that now we have

[mgaligniana]

There we go!