Skip to content

Conversation

@perazz
Copy link
Member

@perazz perazz commented May 11, 2024

Fix #810 @jvdp1 @sscalpone

Renaming this variable rather than the logical kind would minimize the number of changes to the code.

Copy link
Member

@jvdp1 jvdp1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @perazz . Could you remof the hidden file, please?
Should we create a new release v0.6.1 after merging this PR?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you remove this file, please?

@perazz
Copy link
Member Author

perazz commented May 12, 2024

Should we create a new release

I wouldn't think this is a critical update as it is more a standard compliance issue rather than a bug. If however there is a need to have that versioned to allow for broader compiler usage, then it may be worth?

@sscalpone
Copy link

Thanks for the change. It compiles fine in my sandbox.

@jvdp1
Copy link
Member

jvdp1 commented May 13, 2024

Thank you @perazz . I will generate a new version v0.6.1, just to avoid that users try to compile the latest version (v0.6.0) and report the same error multiple times.

@jvdp1 jvdp1 merged commit 1dc58c9 into fortran-lang:master May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants