Skip to content

Conversation

wassup05
Copy link
Contributor

@wassup05 wassup05 commented Jul 2, 2025

To prevent any indices from becoming non-positive

Cause of CI failures in #999

@jalvesz
Copy link
Contributor

jalvesz commented Jul 2, 2025

Thanks @wassup05 for this PR, seems like this was the only procedure from the interface that is not being tested. Could you add 1 test to verify its behavior in test\string\test_string_strip_chomp.f90 ?

Copy link
Member

@perazz perazz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this PR @wassup05. I agree on @jalvesz's comment to add a simple test case before this can be merged.

@wassup05
Copy link
Contributor Author

wassup05 commented Jul 3, 2025

The recent tests failed because both sides of the .and. expression are being evaluated... I am not sure if this is the standard behaviour of Fortran or compiler specific, but the next commit should fix it either way.

@jalvesz jalvesz merged commit 41a1cfc into fortran-lang:master Jul 6, 2025
16 checks passed
@wassup05 wassup05 deleted the chomp branch July 6, 2025 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants