Skip to content

Conversation

@krystophny
Copy link
Contributor

@krystophny krystophny commented Apr 5, 2025

Splitting the already too large module fpm_meta into specialized parts is a necessary step before supporting more metapackages. I plan to implement netcdf, blas/lapack (from openblas and MKL), fftw, suitesparse subsequently. This will be done in the generic way possible with pkg_config, depending on how well the support is on distros (Focus on Debian, Arch, Nix and typical HPC clusters with module). See #439 and #445 .

@perazz do you think you could review this PR?

Copy link
Member

@perazz perazz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this PR @krystophny, I think it is almost ready to merge, here are a few comments.

Copy link
Member

@perazz perazz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thank you @krystophny.

@krystophny
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @perazz !

@perazz perazz merged commit e249419 into fortran-lang:main Apr 6, 2025
25 checks passed
@krystophny krystophny deleted the split_metapackages branch April 11, 2025 19:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants