Compare Hash#select#values vs Hash#values#select vs Hash#values#compact #124
+24 −0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
etagwerker requested changes Mar 2, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this PR adds value if you keep the fastest and fast methods, but I feel like slow is doing something way different.
fast and fastest are calling a method on Array (compact vs select) but slow is calling a method on Hash and it's a little too contrived.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This benchmark proves that get not nil values from hash is fastest with Hash#values#compact