Skip to content

Conversation

@rchauhan18
Copy link
Contributor

@rchauhan18 rchauhan18 commented Mar 19, 2024

Description

We have separated the public and internal pipelines, so we can remove the conditions throughout that are checking internal vs. public to make things more readable.

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

CC: @RussKie @lonitra

@rchauhan18 rchauhan18 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2024 11:30
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the PR metadata: Label to tag PRs, to facilitate with triage label Mar 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mmitche mmitche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WPF runs internal PRs (not yet for .NET 9, but eventually), and at that point many of these changes will be incorrect. Essentially, it won't be correct to assume that PR == public.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the 📭 waiting-author-feedback To request more information from author. label Mar 19, 2024
@RussKie
Copy link
Contributor

RussKie commented Mar 20, 2024

@mmitche clearly has more context than I do so I defer to his judgement. Apologies for the troubles.

@rchauhan18 rchauhan18 added * NO MERGE * metadata: The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) and removed 📭 waiting-author-feedback To request more information from author. labels Mar 20, 2024
@rchauhan18 rchauhan18 closed this May 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

* NO MERGE * metadata: The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) PR metadata: Label to tag PRs, to facilitate with triage

5 participants