-
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 768
Addition to the #579 #585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Addition to the #579 #585
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | ||
package io.appium.java_client.android; | ||
| ||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; | ||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; | ||
| ||
import io.appium.java_client.remote.MobileCapabilityType; | ||
import io.appium.java_client.service.local.AppiumDriverLocalService; | ||
| @@ -10,6 +11,7 @@ | |
import org.openqa.selenium.remote.DesiredCapabilities; | ||
| ||
import java.io.File; | ||
import java.util.function.Predicate; | ||
| ||
public class IntentTest { | ||
private static AppiumDriverLocalService service; | ||
| @@ -47,26 +49,25 @@ public class IntentTest { | |
} | ||
| ||
| ||
@Test public void startActivityWithIntent() { | ||
final Activity activity = new Activity("com.android.mms", ".ui.ComposeMessageActivity"); | ||
activity.setIntentAction("android.intent.action.SEND"); | ||
activity.setIntentCategory("android.intent.category.DEFAULT"); | ||
activity.setIntentFlags("0x4000000"); | ||
activity.setOptionalIntentArguments("-d \"TestIntent\" -t \"text/plain\""); | ||
driver.startActivity(activity); | ||
try { | ||
Thread.sleep(5000); | ||
} catch (InterruptedException e) { | ||
e.printStackTrace(); | ||
} | ||
@Test public void startActivityWithIntent() throws Exception { | ||
assertTrue(((Predicate<AndroidDriver>) driver -> { | ||
final Activity activity = new Activity("com.android.mms", ".ui.ComposeMessageActivity"); | ||
activity.setIntentAction("android.intent.action.SEND"); | ||
activity.setIntentCategory("android.intent.category.DEFAULT"); | ||
activity.setIntentFlags("0x4000000"); | ||
activity.setOptionalIntentArguments("-d \"TestIntent\" -t \"text/plain\""); | ||
driver.startActivity(activity); | ||
return true; | ||
}).test(driver)); | ||
| ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. extra line here | ||
} | ||
| ||
@Test public void startActivityWithDefaultIntentAndDefaultCategoryWithOptionalArgs() { | ||
final Activity activity = new Activity("com.prgguru.android", ".GreetingActivity"); | ||
activity.setIntentAction("android.intent.action.MAIN"); | ||
activity.setIntentCategory("android.intent.category.DEFAULT"); | ||
activity.setIntentFlags("0x4000000"); | ||
activity.setOptionalIntentArguments("--es \"USERNAME\" \"AppiumIntentTest\" -t \"text/plain\""); | ||
final Activity activity = new Activity("com.prgguru.android", ".GreetingActivity") | ||
.setIntentAction("android.intent.action.MAIN") | ||
.setIntentCategory("android.intent.category.DEFAULT") | ||
.setIntentFlags("0x4000000") | ||
.setOptionalIntentArguments("--es \"USERNAME\" \"AppiumIntentTest\" -t \"text/plain\""); | ||
driver.startActivity(activity); | ||
assertEquals(driver.findElementById("com.prgguru.android:id/textView1").getText(), | ||
"Welcome AppiumIntentTest"); | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is the whole construction with assertTrue and return true really necessary?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mykola-mokhnach
Yes. It is for codecy checkings. It requires assertions. Also I have an opinion that assertions inside tests methods is the good style.