Skip to content

Conversation

@edgao
Copy link
Contributor

@edgao edgao commented Mar 20, 2025

no reason to leave MSSQL-specific code in the generic toolkit, I think?

(not sure if there's anything worth testing manually - i.e. if CI passes, presumably we're OK to merge?)

@edgao edgao requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2025 20:26
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 20, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
airbyte-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 20, 2025 10:07pm
Copy link
Contributor

@frifriSF59 frifriSF59 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me.
I think keeping the destination specific code out is something we should aim for as much as possible

@edgao edgao enabled auto-merge (squash) March 20, 2025 22:05
@edgao edgao merged commit 21e2645 into master Mar 20, 2025
27 checks passed
@edgao edgao deleted the edgao/mssql_refactor branch March 20, 2025 22:14
Valgard pushed a commit to mayflower/airbyte that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment