Skip to content

Conversation

@cgoldberg
Copy link
Member

@cgoldberg cgoldberg commented Oct 24, 2025

User description

💥 What does this PR do?

Bump ruff to the latest version.

💡 Additional Considerations

No code changes

🔄 Types of changes

  • Build/CI

PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Bump ruff formatter/linter from 0.14.0 to 0.14.2

  • Update all platform-specific binary checksums in lockfile

  • Update ruff dependency version in tox configuration


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR A["ruff 0.14.0"] -- "version bump" --> B["ruff 0.14.2"] B -- "update checksums" --> C["multitool.lock.json"] B -- "update dependency" --> D["py/tox.ini"] 
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Dependencies
multitool.lock.json
Update ruff binaries and checksums to 0.14.2                         

multitool.lock.json

  • Updated ruff release version from 0.14.0 to 0.14.2 across all platform
    binaries
  • Updated SHA256 checksums for Linux ARM64, Linux x86_64, macOS ARM64,
    macOS x86_64, and Windows x86_64 binaries
  • All five platform-specific binary URLs and hashes refreshed for the
    new version
+10/-10 
tox.ini
Update ruff version in tox configuration                                 

py/tox.ini

  • Updated ruff dependency version from 0.14.0 to 0.14.2 in linting
    testenv
+1/-1     

@cgoldberg cgoldberg added the B-build Includes scripting, bazel and CI integrations label Oct 24, 2025
@SeleniumHQ SeleniumHQ deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Oct 24, 2025
@selenium-ci selenium-ci added the C-py Python Bindings label Oct 24, 2025
@SeleniumHQ SeleniumHQ deleted a comment from qodo-merge-pro bot Oct 24, 2025
@cgoldberg cgoldberg merged commit ed364d9 into SeleniumHQ:trunk Oct 24, 2025
26 checks passed
@cgoldberg cgoldberg deleted the py-bump-ruff-0.14.2 branch October 24, 2025 12:54
This was referenced Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

B-build Includes scripting, bazel and CI integrations C-py Python Bindings Review effort 1/5

2 participants