Skip to content

Conversation

@dengliming
Copy link
Contributor

As title.

@gkorland gkorland requested a review from itamarhaber April 5, 2020 10:37
@gkorland gkorland requested a review from MeirShpilraien April 5, 2020 10:38
@itamarhaber
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good but for consistency, I'd rename the methods.

@dengliming
Copy link
Contributor Author

@itamarhaber Thanks for reviewing. It was done.

@dengliming dengliming requested a review from itamarhaber April 10, 2020 16:30
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #60 into master will increase coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #60 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 90.42% 90.55% +0.13%  ========================================== Files 12 12 Lines 1472 1493 +21 ========================================== + Hits 1331 1352 +21  Misses 141 141 
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
redisearch/client.py 86.02% <100.00%> (+0.68%) ⬆️
test/test.py 98.34% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ae049ff...097c4cd. Read the comment docs.

@gkorland gkorland self-requested a review July 10, 2020 07:09
@gkorland gkorland merged commit be43fe8 into RediSearch:master Jul 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

4 participants