Skip to content

Conversation

yammesicka
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @yammesicka - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
Comment on lines +238 to +243
.replace(/"/g, '"')
.replace(/'/g, "'")
.replace(/&lt;/g, '<')
.replace(/&gt;/g, '>')
.replace(/&amp;/g, '&')
);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code_refinement): Consider using a library function for HTML entity decoding.

Manual replacement of HTML entities with their corresponding characters might not cover all cases. A library function designed for HTML entity decoding could provide a more robust and maintainable solution.

const language = infoString || 'plaintext';
return `<pre><code class="language-${language}">${code}</code></pre>`;
},
codespan: (code) => {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (complexity): Consider using a dedicated utility function for HTML entity escaping in the codespan renderer.

The introduction of the codespan renderer function adds complexity and potential performance concerns due to the multiple .replace() calls for handling HTML entity escaping. This approach increases the cognitive load for developers trying to understand or maintain this code and could be error-prone, especially if new entities need to be handled in the future.

A more maintainable solution might involve using a dedicated utility function for escaping HTML entities, which could simplify the code significantly. For example, using a hypothetical escapeHtml function could reduce the codespan implementation to a single line, improving readability and potentially performance:

codespan: (code) => `<code>${escapeHtml(code)}</code>`

This approach abstracts away the details of HTML entity escaping, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain. If adding a new utility function or library is not feasible, consider consolidating the replacements into a single operation or exploring more efficient methods for handling these replacements to maintain code simplicity and readability.

@yammesicka yammesicka merged commit 575833b into master Mar 26, 2024
@yammesicka yammesicka deleted the fix-inline-code-comments branch March 26, 2024 01:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
1 participant