Deep review analysis of DI migration from constructors to inject() API

[Copilot]

Completed comprehensive code review of the DI migration PR at @dkamburov's request.

Review Scope

• 278 files analyzed (245 test files)
• Components, services, directives, and pipes across all library modules
• Build validation and pattern consistency checks

Findings

✅ Migration Pattern Correctness

All inject() calls properly placed in class field initializers:

// Correct pattern used throughout private cdr = inject(ChangeDetectorRef); protected platform = inject(PlatformUtil); public grid = inject(IGX_GRID_BASE);

✅ Optional Injection Handling

Appropriate use of { optional: true } for SSR compatibility:

private _sanitizer = inject(DomSanitizer, { optional: true }); private _httpClient = inject(HttpClient, { optional: true });

✅ Test File Updates

• All component tests use TestBed.createComponent()
• Manual instantiation only for services without dependencies (e.g., IgxCsvExporterService, IgxTransactionService)

✅ No Anti-patterns Detected

• Zero inject() calls in conditionals, loops, or methods
• Proper visibility modifiers maintained
• Custom injection tokens handled correctly

Build Status

Clean compilation with no TypeScript errors.

Recommendation

APPROVED - Migration follows Angular 14+ best practices. Ready for merge.

---

💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.