Rule of three for Client #306
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…d a custom copy constructor and a custom copy assignment operator.
ianfixes reviewed Sep 23, 2021
| Client c2; // Constructor instantiates a String (s2) | ||
| c2 = c1; // Does c2 get a reference to s1 or a copy of it? | ||
| } // End of scope calls destructor on c1 and c2 | ||
| assertTrue(true); // Was s1 deleted once (with c1) or twice (also with c2)? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it just me or does this comment not match the assertion (yet)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not just you! @prestoncarman thought it was still not very clear so I've updated the tests and comments. Let me know if the new code looks better!
added 2 commits September 23, 2021 08:53
…efore the fix to Client.h we get the following error: ``` # Subtest: Client_copy_constructor ok 1 - assertEqual "1" == *(c1.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 2 - assertEqual "2" == *(c2.mGodmodeDataIn) not ok 3 - assertNotEqual c1.mGodmodeDataIn != c2.mGodmodeDataIn --- operator: != unwanted: 0x603000007750 actual: 0x603000007750 at: file: /Users/jfoster/Documents/Arduino/libraries/TestSomething/test/clientServer.cpp line: 32 ... ok 4 - assertEqual "1" == *(c1.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 5 - assertEqual "1" == *(c2.mGodmodeDataIn) not ok 6 - assertEqual "11" == *(c1.mGodmodeDataIn) --- operator: == expected: 11 actual: 112 at: file: /Users/jfoster/Documents/Arduino/libraries/TestSomething/test/clientServer.cpp line: 37 ... not ok 7 - assertEqual "12" == *(c2.mGodmodeDataIn) --- operator: == expected: 12 actual: 112 at: file: /Users/jfoster/Documents/Arduino/libraries/TestSomething/test/clientServer.cpp line: 38 ... AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==16588==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address (pc 0x0001076e5918 bp 0x7ffee8564290 sp 0x7ffee8564260 T0) ==16588==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==16588==Hint: this fault was caused by a dereference of a high value address (see register values below). Dissassemble the provided pc to learn which register was used. #0 0x1076e5918 in __asan::Allocator::Deallocate(void*, unsigned long, unsigned long, __sanitizer::BufferedStackTrace*, __asan::AllocType)+0x48 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x5918) #1 0x107733125 in wrap__ZdlPv+0xe5 (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x53125) #2 0x10769d528 in String::~String() WString.h:65 #3 0x10769d228 in String::~String() WString.h:65 #4 0x1076a6856 in Client::~Client() Client.h:35 #5 0x1076a2f48 in Client::~Client() Client.h:33 #6 0x1076a3473 in test_Client_copy_constructor::task() clientServer.cpp:39 #7 0x1076a8390 in Test::test() ArduinoUnitTests.h:205 #8 0x1076a7f2d in Test::run(Test::ReporterTAP*) ArduinoUnitTests.h:176 #9 0x1076a5713 in Test::run_and_report(int, char**) ArduinoUnitTests.h:195 #10 0x1076a5658 in main clientServer.cpp:110 #11 0x7fff70a26cc8 in start+0x0 (libdyld.dylib:x86_64+0x1acc8) ==16588==Register values: rax = 0x0000000000000002 rbx = 0xbebebebebebebebe rcx = 0x0000000000000003 rdx = 0x0000000000000000 rdi = 0xbebebebebebebebe rsi = 0xbebebebebebebebe rbp = 0x00007ffee8564290 rsp = 0x00007ffee8564260 r8 = 0x00007ffee85642a0 r9 = 0x0000000000000002 r10 = 0xffffffffffffffff r11 = 0x00000fffffffffff r12 = 0x0000000000000002 r13 = 0x0000000000000000 r14 = 0x00007ffee85642a0 r15 = 0x0000000107780d40 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:x86_64+0x5918) in __asan::Allocator::Deallocate(void*, unsigned long, unsigned long, __sanitizer::BufferedStackTrace*, __asan::AllocType)+0x48 ==16588==ABORTING ...Unit testing clientServer.cpp with g++ for uno ✗ ``` After the fix we get the following: ``` # Subtest: Client_copy_constructor ok 1 - assertEqual "1" == *(c1.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 2 - assertEqual "2" == *(c2.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 3 - assertNotEqual c1.mGodmodeDataIn != c2.mGodmodeDataIn ok 4 - assertEqual "1" == *(c1.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 5 - assertEqual "1" == *(c2.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 6 - assertEqual "11" == *(c1.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 7 - assertEqual "12" == *(c2.mGodmodeDataIn) ok 8 - True true 1..8 ok 2 - Client_copy_constructor ```
prestoncarman approved these changes Sep 23, 2021
ianfixes reviewed Sep 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
if you have a custom destructor, then you probably need a custom copy constructor and a custom copy assignment operator.