Skip to content

Conversation

@AriParkkila
Copy link

No description provided.

@AriParkkila
Copy link
Author

@AnttiKauppila please review.

@40Grit
Copy link

40Grit commented Nov 25, 2019

@kjbracey-arm


This document provides guidelines how to make a cellular device adaptation for Mbed OS.

**Note:** Application developers should use only the `API` folder where Cellular public API is defined. All other Cellular APIs are considered as internal APIs and can change in between any release. If modem vendors want their drivers to be maintained for internal API changes, they need to contribute their drivers to mbed-os/master.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I note this would mean that the proposed get_at_handler()->get_file_handle() in the proposed deprecation of CellularDevice::get_file_handle() would be a redirection to a non-public API.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, ATHandler should probably be part of public API.

Update note formatting, and shorten text for brevity.
@AnotherButler
Copy link
Contributor

Is this content in addition to a blog post or in place of a blog post? I couldn't tell from the mbed-os discussion.

@adbridge
Copy link
Contributor

adbridge commented Dec 5, 2019

Is this content in addition to a blog post or in place of a blog post? I couldn't tell from the mbed-os discussion.

@AriParkkila @kjbracey-arm are either of you able to answer Amanda's question ?

@kjbracey
Copy link
Contributor

kjbracey commented Dec 5, 2019

Sorry, no idea. Concept itself is plausible, and I approve of it, but I don't if this is otherwise being communicated.

It would make sense to be in the 5.15 release notes, at least.

@AnotherButler AnotherButler merged commit 5179f21 into ARMmbed:development Dec 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

5 participants