Skip to content

Conversation

@AugustinLF
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Folllow up of #875. I started from scratch given the amount of conflicts.

Closes #827

If merged as is, don't forget to mention @kiranjd as part of the release.

Kudo to @MattAgn's work in #977 which made that a breeze. Look at the diff between this PR and the previously opened one, the code reorg was def the right call.

Copy link
Member

@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome work @AugustinLF!

The code is indeed much simpler after @MattAgn's #977.

I've added some minor suggests and tweaks to address before we merge this.

@AugustinLF AugustinLF force-pushed the feat/by-role-with-name branch from 67b14da to 188a285 Compare September 20, 2022 12:57
Copy link
Member

@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requested one small minor readability change.

@AugustinLF
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mdjastrzebski we should be good!

Copy link
Member

@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job @AugustinLF 🚀 Also big thank you 🙏🏻 to @kiranjd for submitting the initial implementation of this PR as #875.

@mdjastrzebski mdjastrzebski merged commit c9ab3cf into callstack:main Sep 22, 2022
@AugustinLF AugustinLF deleted the feat/by-role-with-name branch September 22, 2022 12:43
@mdjastrzebski
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 11.2.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants