| Mark Sadecki | 8f35b80 | 2013-10-23 15:36:27 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | <!DOCTYPE html> |
| 2 | <html> |
| 3 | <meta charset="utf-8"> |
| 4 | <head> |
| 5 | <title>Invalid longdesc test page</title> |
| 6 | </head> |
| 7 | <body> |
| 8 | <h1>Fail if you land here</h1> |
| 9 | <div> |
| 10 | <p>Testing tools such as validators should give a warning that this page is probably violating the SHOULD-level requirement that external descriptions which are a fragment of a document should be a well-formed fragment. Using an empty element as a description is almost certainly an inadequate description</p> |
| 11 | </div> |
| 12 | <div> |
| 13 | <h1><a id="fragment"></a>The description</h1> |
| 14 | <p>The image is a drawn cartoon, on the left is a parson in a wheelchair in profile, facing toward the centre of the image, under a banner with the text "e-democracy?" on it. In front of the person is stairs, at the top of the stairs is a table. On the table is a computer, whose screen says "Vote!" and has a red and a green button</p> |
| 15 | <p>The image is signed in the space under the floor that is at the top of the stairs with an "R" rune flipped backwards, somewhat resembling a "Я" with top and bottom border lines sloping upward from left to right, and is marked ©2013. It was actually drawn by Charles McCathie Nevile.</p> |
| 16 | </div> |
| 17 | <p>This paragraph is not part of the description. As of September 2013 there is no conformance requirement making it a failure to read this paragraph, but best practice would be to present only the description, and not this part.</p> |
| 18 | <p>The description is encapsulated in a well-formed fragment, but since the target of a link is an empty element it is not possible to positively identify it.</p> |
| 19 | </body> |
| 20 | </html> |
