|  | gittutorial(7) | 
|  | ============== | 
|  |  | 
|  | NAME | 
|  | ---- | 
|  | gittutorial - A tutorial introduction to git (for version 1.5.1 or newer) | 
|  |  | 
|  | SYNOPSIS | 
|  | -------- | 
|  | git * | 
|  |  | 
|  | DESCRIPTION | 
|  | ----------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make | 
|  | changes to it, and share changes with other developers. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you are instead primarily interested in using git to fetch a project, | 
|  | for example, to test the latest version, you may prefer to start with | 
|  | the first two chapters of link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual]. | 
|  |  | 
|  | First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as | 
|  | `git log --graph` with: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ man git-log | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | or: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git help log | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | With the latter, you can use the manual viewer of your choice; see | 
|  | linkgit:git-help[1] for more information. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is a good idea to introduce yourself to git with your name and | 
|  | public email address before doing any operation. The easiest | 
|  | way to do so is: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git config --global user.name "Your Name Comes Here" | 
|  | $ git config --global user.email you@yourdomain.example.com | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Importing a new project | 
|  | ----------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work. You | 
|  | can place it under git revision control as follows. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ tar xzf project.tar.gz | 
|  | $ cd project | 
|  | $ git init | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | Git will reply | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | Initialized empty Git repository in .git/ | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new | 
|  | directory created, named ".git". | 
|  |  | 
|  | Next, tell git to take a snapshot of the contents of all files under the | 
|  | current directory (note the '.'), with 'git-add': | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git add . | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This snapshot is now stored in a temporary staging area which git calls | 
|  | the "index". You can permanently store the contents of the index in the | 
|  | repository with 'git-commit': | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git commit | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This will prompt you for a commit message. You've now stored the first | 
|  | version of your project in git. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Making changes | 
|  | -------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Modify some files, then add their updated contents to the index: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git add file1 file2 file3 | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | You are now ready to commit. You can see what is about to be committed | 
|  | using 'git-diff' with the --cached option: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git diff --cached | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | (Without --cached, 'git-diff' will show you any changes that | 
|  | you've made but not yet added to the index.) You can also get a brief | 
|  | summary of the situation with 'git-status': | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git status | 
|  | # On branch master | 
|  | # Changes to be committed: | 
|  | # (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage) | 
|  | # | 
|  | #	modified: file1 | 
|  | #	modified: file2 | 
|  | #	modified: file3 | 
|  | # | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you need to make any further adjustments, do so now, and then add any | 
|  | newly modified content to the index. Finally, commit your changes with: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git commit | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This will again prompt you for a message describing the change, and then | 
|  | record a new version of the project. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Alternatively, instead of running 'git-add' beforehand, you can use | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git commit -a | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | which will automatically notice any modified (but not new) files, add | 
|  | them to the index, and commit, all in one step. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to | 
|  | begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character) | 
|  | line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more | 
|  | thorough description. Tools that turn commits into email, for | 
|  | example, use the first line on the Subject: line and the rest of the | 
|  | commit in the body. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Git tracks content not files | 
|  | ---------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Many revision control systems provide an `add` command that tells the | 
|  | system to start tracking changes to a new file. Git's `add` command | 
|  | does something simpler and more powerful: 'git-add' is used both for new | 
|  | and newly modified files, and in both cases it takes a snapshot of the | 
|  | given files and stages that content in the index, ready for inclusion in | 
|  | the next commit. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Viewing project history | 
|  | ----------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | At any point you can view the history of your changes using | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git log | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git log -p | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | Often the overview of the change is useful to get a feel of | 
|  | each step | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git log --stat --summary | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | Managing branches | 
|  | ----------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of | 
|  | development. To create a new branch named "experimental", use | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git branch experimental | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you now run | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git branch | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | you'll get a list of all existing branches: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | experimental | 
|  | * master | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the | 
|  | "master" branch is a default branch that was created for you | 
|  | automatically. The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on; | 
|  | type | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git checkout experimental | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | to switch to the experimental branch. Now edit a file, commit the | 
|  | change, and switch back to the master branch: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | (edit file) | 
|  | $ git commit -a | 
|  | $ git checkout master | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was | 
|  | made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch. | 
|  |  | 
|  | You can make a different change on the master branch: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | (edit file) | 
|  | $ git commit -a | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes | 
|  | made in each. To merge the changes made in experimental into master, run | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git merge experimental | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | If the changes don't conflict, you're done. If there are conflicts, | 
|  | markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict; | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git diff | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | will show this. Once you've edited the files to resolve the | 
|  | conflicts, | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git commit -a | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | will commit the result of the merge. Finally, | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ gitk | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history. | 
|  |  | 
|  | At this point you could delete the experimental branch with | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git branch -d experimental | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This command ensures that the changes in the experimental branch are | 
|  | already in the current branch. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always | 
|  | delete the branch with | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git branch -D crazy-idea | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something | 
|  | out. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Using git for collaboration | 
|  | --------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in | 
|  | /home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the | 
|  | same machine, wants to contribute. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Bob begins with: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | bob$ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's | 
|  | repository. The clone is on an equal footing with the original | 
|  | project, possessing its own copy of the original project's history. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Bob then makes some changes and commits them: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | (edit files) | 
|  | bob$ git commit -a | 
|  | (repeat as necessary) | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository | 
|  | at /home/bob/myrepo. She does this with: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | alice$ cd /home/alice/project | 
|  | alice$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's | 
|  | current branch. If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime, | 
|  | then she may need to manually fix any conflicts. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes | 
|  | from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Note that in general, Alice would want her local changes committed before | 
|  | initiating this "pull". If Bob's work conflicts with what Alice did since | 
|  | their histories forked, Alice will use her working tree and the index to | 
|  | resolve conflicts, and existing local changes will interfere with the | 
|  | conflict resolution process (git will still perform the fetch but will | 
|  | refuse to merge --- Alice will have to get rid of her local changes in | 
|  | some way and pull again when this happens). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Alice can peek at what Bob did without merging first, using the "fetch" | 
|  | command; this allows Alice to inspect what Bob did, using a special | 
|  | symbol "FETCH_HEAD", in order to determine if he has anything worth | 
|  | pulling, like this: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | alice$ git fetch /home/bob/myrepo master | 
|  | alice$ git log -p HEAD..FETCH_HEAD | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This operation is safe even if Alice has uncommitted local changes. | 
|  | The range notation HEAD..FETCH_HEAD" means "show everything that is reachable | 
|  | from the FETCH_HEAD but exclude anything that is reachable from HEAD. | 
|  | Alice already knows everything that leads to her current state (HEAD), | 
|  | and reviewing what Bob has in his state (FETCH_HEAD) that she has not | 
|  | seen with this command | 
|  |  | 
|  | If Alice wants to visualize what Bob did since their histories forked | 
|  | she can issue the following command: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ gitk HEAD..FETCH_HEAD | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This uses the same two-dot range notation we saw earlier with 'git log'. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Alice may want to view what both of them did since they forked. | 
|  | She can use three-dot form instead of the two-dot form: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ gitk HEAD...FETCH_HEAD | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This means "show everything that is reachable from either one, but | 
|  | exclude anything that is reachable from both of them". | 
|  |  | 
|  | Please note that these range notation can be used with both gitk | 
|  | and "git log". | 
|  |  | 
|  | After inspecting what Bob did, if there is nothing urgent, Alice may | 
|  | decide to continue working without pulling from Bob. If Bob's history | 
|  | does have something Alice would immediately need, Alice may choose to | 
|  | stash her work-in-progress first, do a "pull", and then finally unstash | 
|  | her work-in-progress on top of the resulting history. | 
|  |  | 
|  | When you are working in a small closely knit group, it is not | 
|  | unusual to interact with the same repository over and over | 
|  | again. By defining 'remote' repository shorthand, you can make | 
|  | it easier: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | alice$ git remote add bob /home/bob/myrepo | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | With this, Alice can perform the first part of the "pull" operation alone using the | 
|  | 'git-fetch' command without merging them with her own branch, | 
|  | using: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | alice$ git fetch bob | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Unlike the longhand form, when Alice fetches from Bob using a | 
|  | remote repository shorthand set up with 'git-remote', what was | 
|  | fetched is stored in a remote tracking branch, in this case | 
|  | `bob/master`. So after this: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | alice$ git log -p master..bob/master | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from | 
|  | Alice's master branch. | 
|  |  | 
|  | After examining those changes, Alice | 
|  | could merge the changes into her master branch: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | alice$ git merge bob/master | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | This `merge` can also be done by 'pulling from her own remote | 
|  | tracking branch', like this: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | alice$ git pull . remotes/bob/master | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Note that git pull always merges into the current branch, | 
|  | regardless of what else is given on the command line. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | bob$ git pull | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository; | 
|  | when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her | 
|  | repository in the repository configuration, and that location is | 
|  | used for pulls: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | bob$ git config --get remote.origin.url | 
|  | /home/alice/project | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | (The complete configuration created by 'git-clone' is visible using | 
|  | `git config -l`, and the linkgit:git-config[1] man page | 
|  | explains the meaning of each option.) | 
|  |  | 
|  | Git also keeps a pristine copy of Alice's master branch under the | 
|  | name "origin/master": | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | bob$ git branch -r | 
|  | origin/master | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still | 
|  | perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | bob$ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http; | 
|  | see linkgit:git-pull[1] for details. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository | 
|  | that various users push changes to; see linkgit:git-push[1] and | 
|  | linkgit:gitcvs-migration[7]. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Exploring history | 
|  | ----------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits. We | 
|  | have already seen that the 'git-log' command can list those commits. | 
|  | Note that first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the | 
|  | commit: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git log | 
|  | commit c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7 | 
|  | Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 
|  | Date: Tue May 16 17:18:22 2006 -0700 | 
|  |  | 
|  | merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing. | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | We can give this name to 'git-show' to see the details about this | 
|  | commit. | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git show c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7 | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | But there are other ways to refer to commits. You can use any initial | 
|  | part of the name that is long enough to uniquely identify the commit: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git show c82a22c39c	# the first few characters of the name are | 
|  | # usually enough | 
|  | $ git show HEAD	# the tip of the current branch | 
|  | $ git show experimental	# the tip of the "experimental" branch | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Every commit usually has one "parent" commit | 
|  | which points to the previous state of the project: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git show HEAD^ # to see the parent of HEAD | 
|  | $ git show HEAD^^ # to see the grandparent of HEAD | 
|  | $ git show HEAD~4 # to see the great-great grandparent of HEAD | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Note that merge commits may have more than one parent: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git show HEAD^1 # show the first parent of HEAD (same as HEAD^) | 
|  | $ git show HEAD^2 # show the second parent of HEAD | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | You can also give commits names of your own; after running | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git tag v2.5 1b2e1d63ff | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | you can refer to 1b2e1d63ff by the name "v2.5". If you intend to | 
|  | share this name with other people (for example, to identify a release | 
|  | version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see | 
|  | linkgit:git-tag[1] for details. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Any git command that needs to know a commit can take any of these | 
|  | names. For example: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git diff v2.5 HEAD # compare the current HEAD to v2.5 | 
|  | $ git branch stable v2.5 # start a new branch named "stable" based | 
|  | # at v2.5 | 
|  | $ git reset --hard HEAD^ # reset your current branch and working | 
|  | # directory to its state at HEAD^ | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes | 
|  | in the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from | 
|  | this branch. If this branch is the only branch containing those | 
|  | commits, they will be lost. Also, don't use 'git-reset' on a | 
|  | publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as it will | 
|  | force needless merges on other developers to clean up the history. | 
|  | If you need to undo changes that you have pushed, use 'git-revert' | 
|  | instead. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The 'git-grep' command can search for strings in any version of your | 
|  | project, so | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git grep "hello" v2.5 | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you leave out the commit name, 'git-grep' will search any of the | 
|  | files it manages in your current directory. So | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git grep "hello" | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by git. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Many git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified | 
|  | in a number of ways. Here are some examples with 'git-log': | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git log v2.5..v2.6 # commits between v2.5 and v2.6 | 
|  | $ git log v2.5.. # commits since v2.5 | 
|  | $ git log --since="2 weeks ago" # commits from the last 2 weeks | 
|  | $ git log v2.5.. Makefile # commits since v2.5 which modify | 
|  | # Makefile | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | You can also give 'git-log' a "range" of commits where the first is not | 
|  | necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of | 
|  | the branches "stable-release" and "master" diverged from a common | 
|  | commit some time ago, then | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git log stable..experimental | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | will list commits made in the experimental branch but not in the | 
|  | stable branch, while | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git log experimental..stable | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not | 
|  | the experimental branch. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The 'git-log' command has a weakness: it must present commits in a | 
|  | list. When the history has lines of development that diverged and | 
|  | then merged back together, the order in which 'git-log' presents | 
|  | those commits is meaningless. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the Linux kernel, | 
|  | or git itself) have frequent merges, and 'gitk' does a better job of | 
|  | visualizing their history. For example, | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ gitk --since="2 weeks ago" drivers/ | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | allows you to browse any commits from the last 2 weeks of commits | 
|  | that modified files under the "drivers" directory. (Note: you can | 
|  | adjust gitk's fonts by holding down the control key while pressing | 
|  | "-" or "+".) | 
|  |  | 
|  | Finally, most commands that take filenames will optionally allow you | 
|  | to precede any filename by a commit, to specify a particular version | 
|  | of the file: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | You can also use 'git-show' to see any such file: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git show v2.5:Makefile | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Next Steps | 
|  | ---------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | This tutorial should be enough to perform basic distributed revision | 
|  | control for your projects. However, to fully understand the depth | 
|  | and power of git you need to understand two simple ideas on which it | 
|  | is based: | 
|  |  | 
|  | * The object database is the rather elegant system used to | 
|  | store the history of your project--files, directories, and | 
|  | commits. | 
|  |  | 
|  | * The index file is a cache of the state of a directory tree, | 
|  | used to create commits, check out working directories, and | 
|  | hold the various trees involved in a merge. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Part two of this tutorial explains the object | 
|  | database, the index file, and a few other odds and ends that you'll | 
|  | need to make the most of git. You can find it at linkgit:gittutorial-2[7]. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you don't want to continue with that right away, a few other | 
|  | digressions that may be interesting at this point are: | 
|  |  | 
|  | * linkgit:git-format-patch[1], linkgit:git-am[1]: These convert | 
|  | series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa, | 
|  | useful for projects such as the Linux kernel which rely heavily | 
|  | on emailed patches. | 
|  |  | 
|  | * linkgit:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your | 
|  | project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through | 
|  | the history to find the exact commit that's to blame. Git bisect | 
|  | can help you perform a binary search for that commit. It is | 
|  | smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the | 
|  | case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches. | 
|  |  | 
|  | * link:everyday.html[Everyday GIT with 20 Commands Or So] | 
|  |  | 
|  | * linkgit:gitcvs-migration[7]: Git for CVS users. | 
|  |  | 
|  | SEE ALSO | 
|  | -------- | 
|  | linkgit:gittutorial-2[7], | 
|  | linkgit:gitcvs-migration[7], | 
|  | linkgit:gitcore-tutorial[7], | 
|  | linkgit:gitglossary[7], | 
|  | linkgit:git-help[1], | 
|  | link:everyday.html[Everyday git], | 
|  | link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual] | 
|  |  | 
|  | GIT | 
|  | --- | 
|  | Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite. |