|  | gitcvs-migration(7) | 
|  | =================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | NAME | 
|  | ---- | 
|  | gitcvs-migration - Git for CVS users | 
|  |  | 
|  | SYNOPSIS | 
|  | -------- | 
|  | [verse] | 
|  | 'git cvsimport' * | 
|  |  | 
|  | DESCRIPTION | 
|  | ----------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Git differs from CVS in that every working tree contains a repository with | 
|  | a full copy of the project history, and no repository is inherently more | 
|  | important than any other. However, you can emulate the CVS model by | 
|  | designating a single shared repository which people can synchronize with; | 
|  | this document explains how to do that. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Some basic familiarity with Git is required. Having gone through | 
|  | linkgit:gittutorial[7] and | 
|  | linkgit:gitglossary[7] should be sufficient. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Developing against a shared repository | 
|  | -------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Suppose a shared repository is set up in /pub/repo.git on the host | 
|  | foo.com. Then as an individual committer you can clone the shared | 
|  | repository over ssh with: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git clone foo.com:/pub/repo.git/ my-project | 
|  | $ cd my-project | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | and hack away. The equivalent of 'cvs update' is | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git pull origin | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | which merges in any work that others might have done since the clone | 
|  | operation. If there are uncommitted changes in your working tree, commit | 
|  | them first before running git pull. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [NOTE] | 
|  | ================================ | 
|  | The 'pull' command knows where to get updates from because of certain | 
|  | configuration variables that were set by the first 'git clone' | 
|  | command; see `git config -l` and the linkgit:git-config[1] man | 
|  | page for details. | 
|  | ================================ | 
|  |  | 
|  | You can update the shared repository with your changes by first committing | 
|  | your changes, and then using the 'git push' command: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ git push origin master | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | to "push" those commits to the shared repository. If someone else has | 
|  | updated the repository more recently, 'git push', like 'cvs commit', will | 
|  | complain, in which case you must pull any changes before attempting the | 
|  | push again. | 
|  |  | 
|  | In the 'git push' command above we specify the name of the remote branch | 
|  | to update (`master`). If we leave that out, 'git push' tries to update | 
|  | any branches in the remote repository that have the same name as a branch | 
|  | in the local repository. So the last 'push' can be done with either of: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------ | 
|  | $ git push origin | 
|  | $ git push foo.com:/pub/project.git/ | 
|  | ------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | as long as the shared repository does not have any branches | 
|  | other than `master`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Setting Up a Shared Repository | 
|  | ------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | We assume you have already created a Git repository for your project, | 
|  | possibly created from scratch or from a tarball (see | 
|  | linkgit:gittutorial[7]), or imported from an already existing CVS | 
|  | repository (see the next section). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Assume your existing repo is at /home/alice/myproject. Create a new "bare" | 
|  | repository (a repository without a working tree) and fetch your project into | 
|  | it: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ mkdir /pub/my-repo.git | 
|  | $ cd /pub/my-repo.git | 
|  | $ git --bare init --shared | 
|  | $ git --bare fetch /home/alice/myproject master:master | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | Next, give every team member read/write access to this repository. One | 
|  | easy way to do this is to give all the team members ssh access to the | 
|  | machine where the repository is hosted. If you don't want to give them a | 
|  | full shell on the machine, there is a restricted shell which only allows | 
|  | users to do Git pushes and pulls; see linkgit:git-shell[1]. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Put all the committers in the same group, and make the repository | 
|  | writable by that group: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  | $ chgrp -R $group /pub/my-repo.git | 
|  | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | Make sure committers have a umask of at most 027, so that the directories | 
|  | they create are writable and searchable by other group members. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Importing a CVS archive | 
|  | ----------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | NOTE: These instructions use the `git-cvsimport` script which ships with | 
|  | git, but other importers may provide better results. See the note in | 
|  | linkgit:git-cvsimport[1] for other options. | 
|  |  | 
|  | First, install version 2.1 or higher of cvsps from | 
|  | https://github.com/andreyvit/cvsps[https://github.com/andreyvit/cvsps] and make | 
|  | sure it is in your path. Then cd to a checked out CVS working directory | 
|  | of the project you are interested in and run linkgit:git-cvsimport[1]: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ------------------------------------------- | 
|  | $ git cvsimport -C <destination> <module> | 
|  | ------------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | This puts a Git archive of the named CVS module in the directory | 
|  | <destination>, which will be created if necessary. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The import checks out from CVS every revision of every file. Reportedly | 
|  | cvsimport can average some twenty revisions per second, so for a | 
|  | medium-sized project this should not take more than a couple of minutes. | 
|  | Larger projects or remote repositories may take longer. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The main trunk is stored in the Git branch named `origin`, and additional | 
|  | CVS branches are stored in Git branches with the same names. The most | 
|  | recent version of the main trunk is also left checked out on the `master` | 
|  | branch, so you can start adding your own changes right away. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The import is incremental, so if you call it again next month it will | 
|  | fetch any CVS updates that have been made in the meantime. For this to | 
|  | work, you must not modify the imported branches; instead, create new | 
|  | branches for your own changes, and merge in the imported branches as | 
|  | necessary. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you want a shared repository, you will need to make a bare clone | 
|  | of the imported directory, as described above. Then treat the imported | 
|  | directory as another development clone for purposes of merging | 
|  | incremental imports. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Advanced Shared Repository Management | 
|  | ------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Git allows you to specify scripts called "hooks" to be run at certain | 
|  | points. You can use these, for example, to send all commits to the shared | 
|  | repository to a mailing list. See linkgit:githooks[5]. | 
|  |  | 
|  | You can enforce finer grained permissions using update hooks. See | 
|  | link:howto/update-hook-example.html[Controlling access to branches using | 
|  | update hooks]. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Providing CVS Access to a Git Repository | 
|  | ---------------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | It is also possible to provide true CVS access to a Git repository, so | 
|  | that developers can still use CVS; see linkgit:git-cvsserver[1] for | 
|  | details. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Alternative Development Models | 
|  | ------------------------------ | 
|  |  | 
|  | CVS users are accustomed to giving a group of developers commit access to | 
|  | a common repository. As we've seen, this is also possible with Git. | 
|  | However, the distributed nature of Git allows other development models, | 
|  | and you may want to first consider whether one of them might be a better | 
|  | fit for your project. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For example, you can choose a single person to maintain the project's | 
|  | primary public repository. Other developers then clone this repository | 
|  | and each work in their own clone. When they have a series of changes that | 
|  | they're happy with, they ask the maintainer to pull from the branch | 
|  | containing the changes. The maintainer reviews their changes and pulls | 
|  | them into the primary repository, which other developers pull from as | 
|  | necessary to stay coordinated. The Linux kernel and other projects use | 
|  | variants of this model. | 
|  |  | 
|  | With a small group, developers may just pull changes from each other's | 
|  | repositories without the need for a central maintainer. | 
|  |  | 
|  | SEE ALSO | 
|  | -------- | 
|  | linkgit:gittutorial[7], | 
|  | linkgit:gittutorial-2[7], | 
|  | linkgit:gitcore-tutorial[7], | 
|  | linkgit:gitglossary[7], | 
|  | linkgit:giteveryday[7], | 
|  | link:user-manual.html[The Git User's Manual] | 
|  |  | 
|  | GIT | 
|  | --- | 
|  | Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite |