| <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" |
| "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> |
| <!-- Material used from: HTML 4.01 specs: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ --> |
| <html> |
| <head> |
| <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> |
| <title><atomic> design</title> |
| <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="menu.css"> |
| <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="content.css"> |
| </head> |
| |
| <body> |
| <div id="menu"> |
| <div> |
| <a href="http://llvm.org/">LLVM Home</a> |
| </div> |
| |
| <div class="submenu"> |
| <label>libc++ Info</label> |
| <a href="/index.html">About</a> |
| </div> |
| |
| <div class="submenu"> |
| <label>Quick Links</label> |
| <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev">cfe-dev</a> |
| <a href="http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits">cfe-commits</a> |
| <a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/">Bug Reports</a> |
| <a href="http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/">Browse SVN</a> |
| <a href="http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/">Browse ViewVC</a> |
| </div> |
| </div> |
| |
| <div id="content"> |
| <!--*********************************************************************--> |
| <h1><atomic> design</h1> |
| <!--*********************************************************************--> |
| |
| <p> |
| There are currently 3 designs under consideration. They differ in where most |
| of the implementation work is done. The functionality exposed to the customer |
| should be identical (and conforming) for all three designs. |
| </p> |
| |
| <ol type="A"> |
| <li> |
| <a href="atomic_design_a.html">Minimal work for the library</a> |
| </li> |
| <li> |
| <a href="atomic_design_b.html">Something in between</a> |
| </li> |
| <li> |
| <a href="atomic_design_c.html">Minimal work for the front end</a> |
| </li> |
| </ol> |
| |
| <p> |
| With any design, the (back end) compiler writer should note: |
| </p> |
| |
| <blockquote> |
| <p> |
| The decision to implement lock-free operations on any given type (or not) is an |
| ABI-binding decision. One can not change from treating a type as not lock free, |
| to lock free (or vice-versa) without breaking your ABI. |
| </p> |
| |
| <p> |
| Example: |
| </p> |
| |
| <blockquote><pre> |
| TU1.cc |
| ----------- |
| extern atomic<long long> A; |
| int foo() { return A.compare_exchange_strong(w, x); } |
| |
| TU2.cc |
| ----------- |
| extern atomic<long long> A; |
| void bar() { return A.compare_exchange_strong(y, z); } |
| </pre></blockquote> |
| </blockquote> |
| |
| <p> |
| If only <em>one</em> of these calls to <tt>compare_exchange_strong</tt> is |
| implemented with mutex-locked code, then that mutex-locked code will not be |
| executed mutually exclusively of the one implemented in a lock-free manner. |
| </p> |
| |
| </div> |
| </body> |
| </html> |
