Skip to content

Use new "output" parameter instead of "xml-dump" in deptrac v0.19 #16

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 6, 2022
Merged

Use new "output" parameter instead of "xml-dump" in deptrac v0.19 #16

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 6, 2022

Conversation

@Dwarfex
Copy link
Contributor

@Dwarfex Dwarfex commented Mar 22, 2022

This updates deptrac(-shim) and corrects the now more generic parameter "output" used.
See: Deptrac Formatters

#15 might relate
@spaceemotion
Copy link
Owner

I will take a look at this in the coming days. Did the old xml-dump option throw errors? If not, I‘d like to keep both, in case an older version is still being used.
@spaceemotion spaceemotion self-requested a review March 23, 2022 19:54
@Dwarfex
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dwarfex commented Mar 24, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Hi @spaceemotion,
yeah - the option for "xml-dump" was removed with upgrading deptrac.
It seems they opted for using a generic "output" Parameter and using the Format defined by the "formatter" Parameter.
So f.e.: you could now even export JSON with the output parameter and the JSON-Formatter given.
Which is why I mentioned #15
@spaceemotion spaceemotion changed the title update deptrac-shim - it now uses "output" instead of "xml-dump" Use new "output" parameter instead of "xml-dump" in deptrac v0.19 Apr 6, 2022
@spaceemotion spaceemotion merged commit 1d17524 into spaceemotion:wip/v1 Apr 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants

@Dwarfex @spaceemotion