- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
Update the documentation for Scala.js 0.6.x and announce 0.6.0. #114
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is work in progress, and should not be merged before we announce 0.6.0 final. |
597347f
to fb60e1b
Compare 3ad91c2
to cc9a0a9
Compare 1e22f47
to 3c4dc93
Compare 9512157
to 74165f6
Compare Review by anyone who wants to ;-) Also, library authors, ping me here when you've published 0.6.0 artifacts of your libraries. /cc @gzm0 @lihaoyi @alexandru @japgolly @benjaminjackman @inthenow @antonkulaga @mysticfall @jokade @benhutchison @vmunier |
@sjrd scalajs-angulate is ready for 0.6.0: scalajs-angulate: |
@jokade Thanks. But I don't see the artifacts with |
Sorry, you’re right… it’s released to Maven now.
|
Thanks :) I added it to the list. |
doc/calling-javascript.md Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider linking to the ScalaDoc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, good idea.
That's all up to 02267c8 |
Addressed comments. |
Replace it with a note saying it's not part of the Typesafe Reactive platform, and hence is not commercially supported.
Just released scalajs-angular 0.3 which is compatible with Scala.js 0.6.0. By the way, I wrote a cross compiling test framework for 0.6.0 also : Could you include it along with other test frameworks? |
Sure. Done. |
@sjrd That was quick :) Thanks! |
Ok, I have published "com.lihaoyi" %%% "utest" % "0.3.0" "com.lihaoyi" %%% "scalatags" % "0.4.5" "com.lihaoyi" %%% "scalarx" % "0.2.7" "com.lihaoyi" %%% "upickle" % "0.2.6" "com.lihaoyi" %%% "autowire" % "0.2.4" Note that I have removed I'm about halfway through updating lihaoyi.github.io/hands-on-scala-js. Probably will be able to make it through that and scala-js-fiddle in the next 24 hours or so (before/after work) |
Oh and still missing the version of scalatags (tentatively 0.4.3) published with scala-js-dom 0.8.0 |
Did you mean 0.7.0? I see 0.4.5 is published for 0.8.0. |
Oh yeah I meant 0.7.0 |
I've taken another pass at http://lihaoyi.github.io/hands-on-scala-js. If anyone wants to glance through and see if you can find any obvious mistakes (I'm sure they're in there) that'd be great. @sjrd I'm going to try and get scala-js-fiddle/0.6.0 and Scalatags/scala-js-dom0.7.0 out tonight in that order, though I could easily miss one or both by the deadline =P I'd say that's probably OK since the main libraries/docs are out |
I've published the following for 0.6:
Banana-rdf to come soon, after code review @sjrd what is the "deadline" time, please? |
@lihaoyi OK agreed. The deadline time is around 9am UTC, so about 12 hours from now. |
@lihaoyi I did not find any obvious mistakes in your last four commits. Looks good to me :-) |
@inthenow Added. |
Hi, I've updated play-with-scalajs-example to use Scala.js 0.6.0. N.B.: The master branch is not using sbt-play-scalajs for now because sbt-play-scalajs does not allow enough flexibility yet, like attaching multiple scalajs projects to one play project. |
http://www.scala-js-fiddle.com/ is up to 0.6.0. I cut out the async-paintbrush example, and changed the landing page to be less scary (suggested by @dickwall) but otherwise it all works. Also tweaked the CSS to be less scary. I'm going to punt on Scalatags-scalajs-dom-0.7.0 for now. It's an annoying merge (halfway done) to get everything playing right. I'm sufficiently annoyed to say that people should just upgrade their code so I don't need to do it =P |
The fiddle's also back on EC2, which mean it's on a waaay faster machine than the heroku thing, but is costing me 80$ a month for now. This is probably nice to have for any release-traffic-spikes, and I can cut it down if necessary in future. It's not any more than I'm paying AT&T anyway so I'll probably just leave it regardless.. |
Awesome! For the price, I'll see if we can get money from EPFL instead. I'll do that next week when Martin is back. |
Update the documentation for Scala.js 0.6.x and announce 0.6.0.
No description provided.