Skip to content

Conversation

alexander-ding
Copy link
Collaborator

@davidmascharka
Here are the promised problems and solutions! I wrote 5 so far. Feel free to ask for some more! I can pump these out fairly quickly. I just want to run them through you to see if there's anything else I can add to a problem (more explanation/cleaner code/some sort of commentary at the end of each problem explaining some quick tricks in the code). Let me know what you think!

Thanks

@rsokl
Copy link
Owner

rsokl commented Sep 11, 2018

Oh wow! Somehow I didn't get any email notifications about these! Thank you very much for these! I will review this ASAP.

@davidmascharka
Copy link
Collaborator

@rsokl are these final pending proofing or are there more edits in the works?

@rsokl
Copy link
Owner

rsokl commented Sep 30, 2018

@davidmascharka there are still edits to come.

@rsokl
Copy link
Owner

rsokl commented Oct 5, 2018

@davidmascharka this should be good for review 👍

@davidmascharka
Copy link
Collaborator

@rsokl gave it a going-over. Should be good to go, pending your review of edits.

@rsokl
Copy link
Owner

rsokl commented Oct 8, 2018

Thanks for these @davidmascharka ! They're great edits.

@alexding123 I will probably be going live with these today. How would you like to be credited? (Real name? GitHub handle? Twitter? A combination?)

@rsokl rsokl merged commit a90dc72 into master Oct 8, 2018
@rsokl rsokl deleted the module2_problems branch October 8, 2018 13:01
@alexander-ding
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rsokl GitHub handle would be great! Thanks for all the edits!

Also, any suggestions on what to work on next?

@rsokl
Copy link
Owner

rsokl commented Oct 11, 2018

@alexding123 your content is live! :)

@rsokl
Copy link
Owner

rsokl commented Oct 12, 2018

@alexding123 in terms of suggestions for things to work on:

I would like to improve the consistency of PLYMI. One of the most inconsistent aspects of the site are the solutions to the reading comprehension questions at the end of each section. These vary wildly in format and length of discussion. It would be great to have improved uniformity here.

More broadly, any feedback on the overall organization of the site/modules and recommendations towards this end would be great.

More reading comprehension and end-of-module questions/solutions are always welcome :)

Lastly, and this is probably too broad to be actionable, module 4 (OOP) is pretty lame. I think it needs better motivation and context for the readers.

Edit: I should probably post this as a general issue so that others can take part in the discussion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

3 participants