Skip to content

Added Gwen - voice assistant using python #257

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Added Gwen - voice assistant using python #257

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Paras0-7
Copy link
Contributor

@Paras0-7 Paras0-7 commented Jun 15, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Fixes #235
Added a voice assistant using python.
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jun 15, 2021

Hello there! 👋 Welcome to the project! 💖
Thank you and congrats 🎉 for opening your first pull request. Please adhere to our Code of Conduct. 🙌🏻 We will get back to you as soon as we can. 😄

Feel free to get in touch with me through social media handles. Hope to see you there!😄
@prathimacode-hub prathimacode-hub added the LGMSOC21 This issue will be considered for LGM-SOC 21 label Jun 15, 2021
@prathimacode-hub
Copy link
Owner

Follow the PR template. And this PR has conflicts due to the changes you had done in README file of the "AutomationScripts". Kindly correct it. @Paras0-7
@Paras0-7
Copy link
Contributor Author

Paras0-7 commented Jun 15, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Follow the PR template. And this PR has conflicts due to the changes you had done in README file of the "AutomationScripts". Kindly correct it. @Paras0-7

@prathimacode-hub Do I need to add my script name in the Automation readme too?
@prathimacode-hub
Copy link
Owner

Follow the PR template. And this PR has conflicts due to the changes you had done in README file of the "AutomationScripts". Kindly correct it. @Paras0-7

@prathimacode-hub Do I need to add my script name in the Automation readme too?

That's not needed. Remove that change and add the PR template in PR commit message along with issue number. @Paras0-7
@Paras0-7
Copy link
Contributor Author

Follow the PR template. And this PR has conflicts due to the changes you had done in README file of the "AutomationScripts". Kindly correct it. @Paras0-7

@prathimacode-hub Do I need to add my script name in the Automation readme too?

That's not needed. Remove that change and add the PR template in PR commit message along with issue number. @Paras0-7

@prathimacode-hub
I didn't made any changes in the readme file of Automation Scripts.
prathimacode-hub
prathimacode-hub requested changes Jun 16, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner

@prathimacode-hub prathimacode-hub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But it still shows the conflict and reason behind it due to which I'm unable to review. If there is a trouble from your end about not able to rectify or solve this, you can create a PR again. But for that I have to close this PR. Should I? @Paras0-7
@Paras0-7
Copy link
Contributor Author

But it still shows the conflict and reason behind it due to which I'm unable to review. If there is a trouble from your end about not able to rectify or solve this, you can create a PR again. But for that I have to close this PR. Should I? @Paras0-7

@prathimacode-hub you can close this PR. I'll request a new one.
@prathimacode-hub
Copy link
Owner

But it still shows the conflict and reason behind it due to which I'm unable to review. If there is a trouble from your end about not able to rectify or solve this, you can create a PR again. But for that I have to close this PR. Should I? @Paras0-7

@prathimacode-hub you can close this PR. I'll request a new one.

It's closed. You can create a new one. @Paras0-7
@prathimacode-hub prathimacode-hub added invalid This doesn't seem right and removed LGMSOC21 This issue will be considered for LGM-SOC 21 labels Jun 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

invalid This doesn't seem right

2 participants

@Paras0-7 @prathimacode-hub