Skip to content

Conversation

@ckappen
Copy link
Member

@ckappen ckappen commented Apr 14, 2023

What it solves

...

How this PR fixes it

...

Readiness Checklist

Author/Contributor

  • If documentation is needed for this change, has that been included in this pull request
  • Pull request title is brief and descriptive (for a changelog entry)

Reviewing Maintainer

  • Label as breaking if this is a large fundamental change
  • Label as either automation, bug, documentation, or enhancement
  • Label as bump:patch, bump:minor, or bump:major if this PR should create a new release
@ckappen ckappen requested a review from Ic3w0lf April 14, 2023 08:23
@ckappen ckappen self-assigned this Apr 14, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.

Details:

No release type found in pull request title "Listener as dependency". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/ Available types: - feat: A new feature - fix: A bug fix - docs: Documentation only changes - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc) - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature - perf: A code change that improves performance - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm) - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs) - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files - revert: Reverts a previous commit 
@ckappen ckappen merged commit af39a18 into main Apr 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants