Create blacklistipchecker.py #9416
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![algorithms-keeper[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/235834?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
cclauss reviewed Oct 2, 2023
other/blacklistipchecker.py Outdated
| else: | ||
| try: | ||
| IP(x) | ||
| except: |
cclauss reviewed Oct 2, 2023
other/blacklistipchecker.py Outdated
| x = input() | ||
| try: | ||
| IP(x) | ||
| except: |
Contributor Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IPy literally works that way. I can easily fix it with
except Exception as ex:
print('Failed \n" + ex + 'Finishing \n")
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Contributor Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Got it. I can fix it by using logging module. What should i do next?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click details next to each of the failing ❌ tests below and try to get them to be green ✅
added logging for exceptions, fixed invalid var name,
algorithms-keeper bot added the require type hints There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
added type-hints, fixed var name
algorithms-keeper bot removed the require type hints There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
Fixed type hint
Fixed type hints, and list creation err
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
other/blacklistipchecker.py Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ | |||
| ###################################### | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
An error occurred while parsing the file: other/blacklistipchecker.py
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/render/project/src/algorithms_keeper/parser/python_parser.py", line 146, in parse reports = lint_file( ^^^^^^^^^^ libcst._exceptions.ParserSyntaxError: Syntax Error @ 1:1. tokenizer error: unterminated string literal ###################################### ^Fixed bunch of hasher in the beginning of file
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Removed e-mail functionality to pass tests
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Fixed deprecated type hints, sorted imports
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Sorted imports with isort
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Fixed some types mismatch
cclauss reviewed Oct 2, 2023
Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
cclauss reviewed Oct 2, 2023
Shortened loop as recommended by tests
cclauss reviewed Oct 2, 2023
other/blacklistipchecker.py Outdated
Comment on lines 42 to 45
| for b in octets: | ||
| if int(b) < 0 or int(b) > 255: | ||
| return False | ||
| return True |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| for b in octets: | |
| if int(b) < 0 or int(b) > 255: | |
| return False | |
| return True | |
| return all(0 <= int(octet) <= 255 for octet in octets) |
cclauss reviewed Oct 2, 2023
Fixed elif intead of else
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
| link = f"https://api.blacklistchecker.com/check/{ip}" | ||
| result = requests.get(link, auth=(api_key, "") | ||
| result_dec = json.loads(result.content) | ||
| print(result_dec) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
An error occurred while parsing the file: other/blacklistipchecker.py
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/render/project/src/algorithms_keeper/parser/python_parser.py", line 146, in parse reports = lint_file( ^^^^^^^^^^ libcst._exceptions.ParserSyntaxError: Syntax Error @ 20:16. parser error: error at 19:15: expected one of !=, %, &, (, *, **, +, ,, -, ., /, //, <, <<, <=, ==, >, >=, >>, @, [, ^, and, if, in, is, not, or, | print(result_dec) ^Co-authored-by: Christian Clauss <cclauss@me.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
| link = f"https://api.blacklistchecker.com/check/{ip}" | ||
| result = requests.get(link, auth=(api_key, "") | ||
| result_dec = json.loads(result.content) | ||
| print(result_dec) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
An error occurred while parsing the file: other/blacklistipchecker.py
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/render/project/src/algorithms_keeper/parser/python_parser.py", line 146, in parse reports = lint_file( ^^^^^^^^^^ libcst._exceptions.ParserSyntaxError: Syntax Error @ 20:16. parser error: error at 19:15: expected one of !=, %, &, (, *, **, +, ,, -, ., /, //, <, <<, <=, ==, >, >=, >>, @, [, ^, and, if, in, is, not, or, | print(result_dec) ^missing ")"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Click here to look at the relevant links ⬇️
🔗 Relevant Links
Repository:
Python:
Automated review generated by algorithms-keeper. If there's any problem regarding this review, please open an issue about it.
algorithms-keeper commands and options
algorithms-keeper actions can be triggered by commenting on this PR:
@algorithms-keeper reviewto trigger the checks for only added pull request files@algorithms-keeper review-allto trigger the checks for all the pull request files, including the modified files. As we cannot post review comments on lines not part of the diff, this command will post all the messages in one comment.NOTE: Commands are in beta and so this feature is restricted only to a member or owner of the organization.
| detects = "!" | ||
| return (res, detects) | ||
| else result_dec.get("detections") != 0: | ||
| res = ip |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
An error occurred while parsing the file: other/blacklistipchecker.py
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/render/project/src/algorithms_keeper/parser/python_parser.py", line 146, in parse reports = lint_file( ^^^^^^^^^^ libcst._exceptions.ParserSyntaxError: Syntax Error @ 26:17. parser error: error at 25:19: expected : res = ip ^added missing rightside comparison agrument
Changed var type
added type-hints
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
fixed double var definition
14 tasks
Contributor Author
| Who can review this PR? @cclauss help please |
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your change:
Checklist: