35

This question serves as an organized reference of client libraries available for the Stack Exchange API. This is intended to be an all-inclusive list of libraries, so if you develop a library, feel free to insert it into the list below in the appropriate location. Each library is listed in alphabetical order under the language it is written / developed for.

Language Name API Version Newest Release =========================================================== ActionScript ActionStack 1.0 July 9, 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- C++ so++ 1.0 July 13, 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- D Tangoverflow 1.0 June 1, 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Java StackExchange 1.0 July 8, 2010 stackoverflow-java-sdk 1.1 Feb. 18, 2011 StackWrap4J 1.0 July 26, 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- JavaScript Soapi.JS 1.0 July 19, 2010 Soapi.JS 2 1.0 Sept 17, 2010 Stack.JS 2.0 Jan. 23, 2012 StackScript 1.0 July 9, 2010 StackUnderflow.js 1.0 Dec. 22, 2011 ----------------------------------------------------------- .Net BridgeStack 2.0 Jan. 22, 2012 Stacky 2.0 Jan. 19, 2012 Soapi.CS 1.0 Sept 16, 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Objective-C CoreStack 1.0 Nov. 7, 2011 StackKit 1.0 Feb. 8, 2011 MSOEngine 1.0 June 4, 2010 ----------------------------------------------------------- Perl Net::StackExchange2 2.1 Feb. 3, 2013 ---------------------------------------------------------- PHP PHPstack 1.0 June 26, 2010 Stack.PHP 2.0 Feb. 5, 2012 ----------------------------------------------------------- Python Stack.PY 2.1 May 14, 2012 Py-StackExchange 1.1 Dec. 18, 2011 pyso.py 1.0 Oct. 24, 2010 se-api-py 2.1 Feb. 26, 2013 stack2py 2.1 Mar. 16, 2013 ----------------------------------------------------------- Ruby Pilha 1.1 Dec. 4, 2011 rubyoverflow 2.0 Jan. 3, 2012 -----------------------------------------------------------
17
  • I've done a PHP wrapper but don't have enough reputation to edit it in. Could someone link to it? Commented May 28, 2010 at 14:28
  • There you go. :) Commented May 28, 2010 at 15:16
  • Why's D in there? And thanks for adding MSOEngine to the list whoever did it Commented May 28, 2010 at 19:21
  • @Matt: D needs a wrapper too. Every compiled language deserves a wrapper IMHO. Commented May 29, 2010 at 1:03
  • @George If somebody creates one for D I will learn D just to use it Commented May 29, 2010 at 1:07
  • @Thomas: I started a branch on Launchpad. Only one file in, but I'll get back to it later today. Commented May 29, 2010 at 14:01
  • @dal: I added it. Commented May 29, 2010 at 21:23
  • 1
    @Thomas It's ON!!! Commented May 30, 2010 at 1:57
  • What about plain C? I like C more than C++ oddly enough. Also where is the Assembly and Machine Code love? Commented May 31, 2010 at 6:28
  • @Earlz: I'll add it... but don't expect a lot of love... :) Commented May 31, 2010 at 6:30
  • yes, because somebody will write a library in assembly. What I want is one for the TRS-80 :) Commented May 31, 2010 at 14:50
  • Well, if someone wrote a C library (I imagine the C++ one would be a pain to work with) you could call it from assembly. :) (Realistically, some call-out would be required anyway, so it's not cheating that much.) Commented May 31, 2010 at 17:02
  • 1
    Considering the only user of the assembly version would be Steve Gibson, I think it's OK to skip it... Commented Jun 28, 2010 at 4:51
  • Thanks whoever reformatted the page. I was going to do it myself anyway... now I don't have to. Commented Aug 22, 2010 at 18:40
  • @code: It's not the first time... look closely at the edit history. Commented Aug 23, 2010 at 20:56

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.