1

These observations are from CentOS 6.3, 6.4 and 6.5. I have a multipath device with a single partition:

# ls -l /dev/mapper/ total 0 crw-rw---- 1 admin root 10, 57 Dec 22 12:52 control lrwxrwxrwx 1 admin root 7 Dec 24 12:22 mpatha -> ../dm-0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 admin root 7 Dec 24 12:22 mpathap1 -> ../dm-1 # kpartx -l /dev/mapper/mpatha mpatha1 : 0 5368719293 /dev/mapper/mpatha 34 

Then, parted is used to remove the partition:

# parted /dev/mapper/mpatha GNU Parted 1.7.1 Using /dev/dm-0 Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands. (parted) unit GB (parted) p Disk /dev/dm-0: 2749GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 1 0.00GB 2749GB 2749GB ext3 primary (parted) rm 1 (parted) q Information: Don't forget to update /etc/fstab, if necessary. 

However, the device special file /dev/mapper/mpathap1 does not get automatically removed. Running ls -l /dev/mapper/ produces exactly the same output as shown above, while kpartx -l /dev/mapper/mpatha, exits normally ($? = 0) without printing anything.

My question is related to this one. However, there the issue was with no device special file being created in /dev/ while mine is about removal and that too on multipath devices. I am doing certain operations in a script and have already instrumented checks on whether expected device files actually get created or removed and if not then I call kpartx -a -p p <device> (took that hint from /lib/udev/rules.d/40-multipath.rules) or kpartx -d <device> as the case may be. But I have not yet had a satisfying understanding.

When in general, creating partitions on an extra local disk or a portable hard disk using parted works perfectly fine why should anything more be required to be done on disks coming from a SAN? Any information will be appreciated. Thanks!

2
  • why you created a partion on luns? LUNS = LOGICAL UNIT Commented May 26, 2015 at 9:38
  • It is normal to create partitions on a block device. Are there any risks of doing so with LUNs? Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 5:31

1 Answer 1

1

It has been possible to fix this issue by updating parted to 2.1-21. We have a system based on CentOS in which certain components are source compiled and parted happens to be one. I have not yet tried to explore if there was any bug in the previous parted release.

1
  • Done. I have now mentioned CentOS 6.5 in the question. Commented May 26, 2015 at 9:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.