2
$\begingroup$

Let $I\subseteq \mathbb{R}$ be a closed bounded interval and $f:I \to I$ a monotonic increasing function and $S$ the countable set of points $s$ such that $|f^{-1}(s)| > 1$. Is the following conjecture true?

For every Lebesgue null set $N \subseteq I\setminus S$, the preimage $f^{-1}(N)$ is again a Lebesgue null set.

Edit: As pointed out by Christian Remling in the comments, it seems that this is false in general. Are there assumptions on $f$ that guarantee that the conjecture holds? I am particularly interested in whether absolute continuity of $f$ is sufficient.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ No. If $f$ is strictly increasing, then you are asking if $g=f^{-1}$ maps null sets to null sets, which is false for singular continuous functions. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 18, 2024 at 22:01
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristianRemling : Do you know the answer if we additionally require that $f$ be continuous? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 19, 2024 at 1:51
  • $\begingroup$ @IosifPinelis: This is the situation I had in mind: $g=f^{-1}$ a strictly increasing, singular continuous (as in singular + continuous) function, so that $f$ will also be strictly increasing and continuous. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 19, 2024 at 20:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A simple and standard counterexample: let $C'$ be a fat Cantor set obtained by removing the middle $1/2^n$ at each stage, and $C$ be the standard (null) Cantor set obtained by removing the middle third at each stage, both in $I=[0,1]$. Construct $f\colon I\to I$ by taking the increasing bijective affine map from each open interval component of the complement of $C'$ to the corresponding one of $C$, and extend it by continuity to $I$. Then $f\colon I\to I$ is a continuous increasing bijection and $f^{-1}(C) = C'$, yet $C$ is null while $C'$ is not. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 19, 2024 at 23:01

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

I will answer in the negative the question "If $f:I\to I$ is a strictly increasing absolutely continuous function, does $f^{-1}$ send Lebesgue null sets to Lebesgue null sets?"

Indeed, suppose that $f$ is an absolutely continuous strictly increasing bijection on $I$, such that all preimages of nullsets are null. Write $g:=f^{-1}$. Note that, under the hypotheses, $f$ and $g$ are homeomorphisms. Additionally, $m(f^{-1}(A))=m(g(A))$ is null for all $A\subseteq I$ null, so $g$ maps null sets to null sets, i.e. $g$ satisfies the Luzin property.

It is a classical fact that a function is a.c. if and only if it is continuous, BV, and has the Luzin property. Since $g$ is continuous and has the Luzin property, and is a bounded increasing function, it follows that $g$ is a.c.

Thus, $f$ has to also have the property that its inverse is a.c. On the other hand, strictly increasing a.c. functions need not have a.c. inverses; indeed, if $g=c(x)+x$ with $c:[0,1]\to[0,1]$ the Cantor function, and $f=g^{-1}$, then $g$ is clearly not a.c., but $f$ is Lipschitz (hence a.c.) and strictly increasing.

As suggested in the preceding, the correct condition has something to do with $g=f^{-1}$ being absolutely continuous, which might be thought of as $f'$ being not too small (i.e. $\frac{1}{f'}$ being integrable).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

My colleague and I came up with a proof for the following related Theorem:

Let $I \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ be an interval, $f:I\to I$ an absolutely continuous monotone increasing function. Define $I_{f'>0}:=\{t \in I\mid f'(t) \text{ exists and } f'(t) >0\}$. Then $f$ fulfills Lusin's $N^{-1}$ property on $f(I_{f'>0})$, i.e. for every null set $\mathcal{N}\subseteq f(I_{f'>0})$, we have that $f^{-1}(\mathcal{N})$ is a null set as well.

Proof sketch: One can show that $f$ is injective on $I_{f'>0}$ and hence admits an inverse $g: f(I_{f'>0}) \to I$. Extending this $g$ to the whole set in a monotone manner to $\tilde{g}$ yields a function that is differentiable on every (not almost every) point in $f(I_{f'>0})$. This property allows for every null set $N \subseteq f(I_{f'>0})$ the estimate $\sigma(\tilde{g}(N)) \leq \int_N \tilde{g}'d\sigma = 0$ where $\sigma$ is the Lebesgue measure (see (1), Chapter 7). Observing that $f^{-1}(N) = \tilde{g}(N)$ due to $N \subseteq f(I_{f'>0})$ finishes the proof.

Remark: It seems that the absolute continuity of $f$ may be relaxed.

(1) Bruckner, Andrew M.; Bruckner, Judith B.; Thomson, Brian S., Real analysis, International Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International. xiv, 713 p. (1997). ZBL0872.26001.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.