4
$\begingroup$

Given a subset $\mathcal S\subset \mathbb N\setminus\{0\}$ of (strictly) positive integers, we can consider subsets $A$ of $\mathbb N$ (or $\mathbb Z$) with no differences in $\mathcal S$.

Examples: If $\mathcal S=1+2\mathbb N$ we can take $A=2\mathbb N$. If $\mathcal S=(2n)^{\mathbb N}=\lbrace 1,2n,(2n)^2,\ldots\rbrace$, we can take for $\mathcal A$ all integers in the classes of $0,2,4,\ldots,2n-2 \pmod{2n+1}$.

If $\mathcal S=\mathcal F=\lbrace 1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,\ldots\rbrace$ is the set of Fibonacci numbers, the greedy algorithm (which adds iteratively the smallest possible element) starting with $0$ yields $$A=\lbrace 0,4,10,14,20,24,30,36,40,46,50,56,60,66,72,76,82,\ldots\rbrace \ .$$ (This sequence is missing in the OEIS, the sequence augmented by $1$ coincides with A314043 up to $56+1=57$ before differing by $1$ on $60+1=61<62$.)

Denoting by $a_1=0<a_2=4<a_3=10<\ldots$ the increasing sequence underlying $\mathcal A$, the graph of the function $i\longmapsto \frac{a_i}{i}$ for $i=400,\ldots,12000$ is given by

<span class=$i\longmapsto \frac{a_i}{i},i=400\ldots 12000$" />

This suggests perhaps the existence of a limit-density of $\mathcal A$ as a subset of $\mathbb N$.

Multiplicities in gap-sizes of the increasing sequence $a_1,a_2,\ldots$ define the gap-size polynomial $G(N)=\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}t^{a_{i+1}-a_i}$. We get $$G(1000)=354t^4+553t^6+8t^7+9t^9+42t^{10}+t^{11}+11t^{12}+t^{14} +2t^{15}+9t^{16}+\ldots+t^{28}$$ and $$G(10000)=3445t^4+5467t^6+40t^7+57t^9+498t^{10}+10t^{11}+121t^{12}+\ldots+t^{54}$$ indicating perhaps also some sort of limit frequencies for gap-sizes.

A final observation is the rarity of odd elements in $\mathcal A$: only 97 of the first $10000$ elements in $\mathcal A$ are odd. (For $n$ an odd number, elements of $A$ seem to be more ore less equidistributed modulo $n$.)

Is there an explanation for these (empirical) observations or are they artefacts?

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Intuitively, it seems that the rarity of odd elements can be explained by the fact that two thirds of Fibonacci numbers are odd. This gives a bias towards even numbers at the start, and that bias then self-reinforces. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2023 at 15:58
  • $\begingroup$ Nice observation! Thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2023 at 16:15
  • $\begingroup$ Starting from the second term $4$ and up to $128$ the sequence coincides with $2$ times OEIS A182771 i.e. $2\lfloor n(6+\sqrt{3})/3 \rfloor$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2023 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ @FabiusWiesner The sequence contains odd terms (169 is the first odd term). It is therefore different. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2023 at 19:08
  • $\begingroup$ This can be thought of in terms of a two-player game called a subtraction game, where given a set $S\subset\mathbf N$ called the subtraction set, two players have a heap of $n$ tokens between them, and are able to remove $s$ tokens during their turn for some $s\in S$; the last player to move is then the winner. The set $A$ in question is then the set of cold positions of this game when $S=\mathcal F$; that is, the set of numbers $n$ such that first player in a game of $n$ tokens can never win under optimal play. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2023 at 22:29

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.