3
$\begingroup$

For the Gauss circle problem $$ R(x):=\sum_{0 \leq n \leq x} r_2(n)=\pi x+P(x), P(x)=O(x^{\frac{1}{4}+\epsilon}) $$ Gauss may not know the integral formula of the error term. $$ \int_0^X|P(x)| d x=O\left(X^{1+1 / 4}\right) $$ Assuming he really doesn't know, how does he make the guess of the exponent $\frac{1}{4}$?

Is there any chance to recover the path Gauss gets the reasonable exponent $\frac{1}{4}$?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

EDIT: According to https://cmsr.rutgers.edu/images/people/lebowitz_joel/publications/jll.pub_347.pdf, the conjecture that the exponent is $\frac{1}{4} + \epsilon$ is due to Hardy, and not Gauss. The paper of Hardy that it cites as containing the conjecture (Hardy, G.H.: The average order of the arithmetical functions $P(x)$ and $\Delta(x)$. Proc. London Math. Soc. 15, 192-213 (1916)) proves $\int_1^X |P(t)| dt = O(X^{1 + 1/4 + \epsilon})$. In the proof, Hardy uses his identity expressing $P$ as a sum of Bessel functions, where each individual term of the sum is $O(X^{1/4})$ (e.g. see https://mathoverflow.net/a/314011/481175). This was probably the true inspiration for his conjecture.

My original answer, describing a probabilistic heuristic for the error term, is contained below.


I’m not sure how Gauss thought about this, but here is a heuristic way to see why this should be true.

To leading order, one would expect $4\pi \sqrt{x}$ lattice points within a distance of 1 to the circle, by taking the difference in the areas of circles of radius $\sqrt{x}\pm 1$.

If one pretends that each of these points falls inside/outside of the circle with iid probability $\frac{1}{2}$, the total number that fall inside is $2\pi\sqrt{x} + O_p(x^{1/4})$ by the central limit theorem.

$2\pi\sqrt{x}$ of these points are already included in the crude estimate $\pi x$ (as the area between the circles of radius $\sqrt{x}$ and $\sqrt{x}-1$).

Thus, if one buys the probabilistic heuristic, the error term is of order $x^{1/4}$ for a fixed $x$. One may expect additional logarithmic factors when one considers the worst deviation over all $x$, as in the extension from the central limit theorem to the law of the iterated logarithm. To be safe, one can conjecture the error term is $O(x^{1/4 + \epsilon})$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for this point of view, but I think these points fall outside a little bit more than points fall inside because the boundary of the circle has a little bit curved to the inside. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2023 at 10:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Indeed, this is true. But for large $x$, the boundary is nearly linear over distances of size $O(1)$. So I think that no close-by lattice point would 'see' the curvature, and the only effect would be a modification of the global probability of inclusion from $\frac{1}{2}$ to $\frac{x - (\sqrt{x} - 1)^2}{(\sqrt{x} + 1)^2 - (\sqrt{x} - 1)^2} = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{4\sqrt{x}}$. This only affects the above heuristic by lower order terms. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2023 at 16:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @katago I have updated my answer to include a historically more accurate explanation. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2023 at 18:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.