4
$\begingroup$

I am reconsidering an argument previously I thought obvious but now I feel I do not understand. Let $G$ be a finite flat group scheme over a finite field $k$. $G^\vee$ the Cartier dual of it. Let $TG$ denote its Lie algebra. $\mathbb{G}_a$ the additive group scheme. Then we have

$$ TG\cong \mathrm{Hom}(G^\vee, \mathbb{G}_a) $$

Previously I am thinking $G\cong \mathrm{Hom}(G^\vee,\mathbb{G}_m)$ then take the tangent space we have the argument. But it seems I can not prove it strictly. Any help?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

This is correct. Here's another to see it (assume for simplicity we are working over a field $k$). Let $R_\epsilon : = k[\epsilon]/\epsilon^2$ and let $S_\epsilon:= Spec R_\epsilon.$ This is a scheme with a single $k$-point, $s\in S$ and a one-dimensional tangent space. Now recall that the tangent space can be interpreted as a mapping space (in the category of schemes): $$TG = \{f\in Hom(S_\epsilon, G)\mid f(s) = e\}.$$

On the other hand, $$Hom(G^\vee, \mathbb{G}_a) : = Hom_{Hopf}(k[x], O_G^\vee) \cong Hom_{Hopf}(O_G, k[x]^\vee),$$ where Hom is taken in the category of Hopf algebras. Now $k[x]$ has basis $x^n$ and $k[x]^\vee$ has dual elements $x^\vee_i$ (this is not quite a basis, unless we define the dual more carefully, but that isn't relevant here). Now you can check directly that $$(x_1^\vee)^2 = 0,$$ so given $f\in \hom(G^\vee, \mathbb{G}_a)$, the function $f^\vee: O_G\to k[x]^\vee$ can be restricted to the subring $k[x_1^\vee]\cong R_\epsilon$, giving a tangent vector (in $Hom(Spec R_\epsilon, G)$, of schemes). Conversely, say you have a map $S_\epsilon\to G$ with the closed point going to $e\in G$. Dually, you have a map of co-rings $k\cdot 1^\vee\oplus k\cdot\epsilon^\vee\to O_G^\vee,$ taking $1^\vee$ to the identity. Now remembering the ring structure on $O_G^\vee,$ this extends to a map from the polynomial ring $k[\epsilon^\vee]\to O_G^\vee,$ and setting $x = \epsilon^\vee,$ you can check that this construction is converse to the previous one (in particular, the resulting map is a map of Hopf algebras).

There is a fancy way to generalize this idea in terms of adjoint functors, as follows. Let $Ring_*$ be the category of augmented rings, dual to the category of affine schemes with a basepoint (here rings and Hopf algebras are assumed to be commutative and co-commutative), and let $coRing_*$ be the category of coaugmented corings (with all operations and axioms reversed).

Then the forgetful functor $$\mathtt{forg}:Hopf\to coRing_*$$ (which ignores multiplication but remembers comultiplication and the coaugmetnation — equivalently, unit) has a left adjoint, $$\mathtt{free}:coRing_*\to Hopf.$$ This is actually very easy to see: any coaugmented coring $R$ can be canonically written as $k\cdot 1 \oplus R/k,$ and the free Hopf algebra on $k\oplus R/k$ is simply $k[R/k],$ with comultiplication induced from that on $R$. In particular, plugging in the co-augmented co-ring corresponding to $S_\epsilon,$ which is $R_\epsilon^\vee$, we can compute $\mathtt{free}R_\epsilon^\vee \cong O_{\mathbb{G}_a}$ as Hopf algebras, and the statement you want follows from the universal property.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 26, 2019 at 12:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.