0
$\begingroup$

Recall that a space $X$ is metaLindelof if every open cover of $X$ has a point-countable open refinement. A space $X$ is metacompact if every open cover of $X$ has a point-finite open refinement.

I have the following two questions, because the questons are similar, I put together here:

Is there a $\sigma$-metaLindelof space which is a not metaLindelof?

Is there a $\sigma$-metacompact space which is not metacompact?

Thanks for your help.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

In fact, there is a space which is the union of two paracompact spaces which is not metaLindelof. Let $X$ be a $\psi$-space, that is, a locally compact, pseudocompact space having a countable dense set of isolated points and such that the set of non-isolated points is uncountable, closed, and discrete. If $A$ is the set of isolated points and $B = X \setminus A$, then each of $A$ and $B$, being metrizable, is paracompact. For each $x \in B$ let $U_x$ be a neighborhood of $x$ such that $U_x \cap B = \{x\}$. Let ${\mathcal U}$ be the cover $\{U_x : x \in B\} \cup \{ \{n\}: n \in X \setminus \cup\{U_x : x \in B\}\}$. Since $B$ is uncountable and discrete and $A$ is countable, for every refinement $\mathcal V$ of $\mathcal U$ there is an $n \in A$ which is contained in uncountably many elements of $\mathcal V$, so $X$ is not metaLindelof.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.