Add CI action to install package from commit hash (#1781)

[ashwani99]

Pull Request check-list

Please make sure to review and check all of these items:

• Does $ tox pass with this change (including linting)?
• Do the CI tests pass with this change (enable it first in your forked repo and wait for the github action build to finish)?
• Is the new or changed code fully tested?
• Is a documentation update included (if this change modifies existing APIs, or introduces new ones)?
• Is there an example added to the examples folder (if applicable)?

NOTE: these things are not required to open a PR and can be done
afterwards / while the PR is open.

Description of change

• Resolves CI Should pip install from the repo #1781
• Adding a CI action to pip install the package from current commit source

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1790 (459cab5) into master (f82ab33) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1790 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 94.22% 94.22% ======================================= Files 74 74 Lines 15681 15681 ======================================= Hits 14776 14776 Misses 905 905 

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f82ab33...459cab5. Read the comment docs.

[chayim]

@ashwani99 awesome - this reproduces #1784 perfectly. I'll see what I can do to fix that.

[WisdomPill]

My two cents, I think this should be done for every version of python supported

[chayim]

@WisdomPill Now that we have this, I think it's fair. @ashwani99 mind trying to yank the python-version and add it to your matrix, in addition to updating the name for this test to reflect the matrix? Then, I think we have something amazing, test-wise. Also, if you prefer I can add this change directly to your PR. I'd never want to step on your toes.

[ashwani99]

@chayim sure, I will add the support for all python versions 3.6+

[chayim]

@ashwani99 For what it's worth, this was alerady useful. I used it to validate #1792 our collaboration on the resulting change from #1784

[chayim]

Thanks @ashwani99! It has been such a pleasure. Merging as discussed in #1784