- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Performance improvement (slicing) for #103 #130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just add a condition in here. It changes format, so the block is huge.
| Thanks, I'll have a look. |
| @saledouble Can you please add a link to the issue in the description? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not just if (cgNode....) do stuff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that would enhance code readability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you are right. I was muddle-headed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we add an INFO log so that we can verify that only client nodes are being considered?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you want to pass to Logger? The processed cgNodes?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please reference the bug ID here.
| We need to verify that we are processing all of and only the client nodes, so you tell me :). |
| Output example: |
#103 False positive regarding missing terminal operation when a stream is returned from a method