Skip to content

Conversation

@gliptak
Copy link
Contributor

@gliptak gliptak commented Sep 25, 2017

#17505

  • closes #xxxx
  • tests added / passed
  • passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
  • whatsnew entry
The chained assignment warnings / exceptions are aiming to inform the user of a possibly invalid
assignment. There may be false positives; situations where a chained assignment is inadvertently
reported.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would move this to the top of the section and make it a note::

@jreback jreback added the Docs label Sep 26, 2017
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #17672 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #17672 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 91.27% 91.24% -0.03%  ========================================== Files 163 163 Lines 49760 49808 +48 ========================================== + Hits 45416 45445 +29  - Misses 4344 4363 +19
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.03% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
#single 40.32% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/core/categorical.py 95.28% <0%> (-0.43%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.73% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/core/accessor.py 93.65% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/core/internals.py 94.3% <0%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
pandas/core/indexes/base.py 96.28% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/core/series.py 94.93% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/core/generic.py 92.07% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/io/parsers.py 95.48% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/io/date_converters.py 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
... and 4 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f9d88cd...01432e4. Read the comment docs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #17672 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #17672 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 91.27% 91.24% -0.03%  ========================================== Files 163 163 Lines 49760 49808 +48 ========================================== + Hits 45416 45445 +29  - Misses 4344 4363 +19
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 89.03% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
#single 40.32% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py 25% <0%> (-58.34%) ⬇️
pandas/core/categorical.py 95.28% <0%> (-0.43%) ⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py 97.73% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/core/accessor.py 93.65% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
pandas/core/internals.py 94.3% <0%> (-0.07%) ⬇️
pandas/core/indexes/base.py 96.28% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/core/series.py 94.93% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/core/generic.py 92.07% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/io/parsers.py 95.48% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
pandas/io/date_converters.py 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
... and 4 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f9d88cd...5c6bc02. Read the comment docs.

.. note::

The chained assignment warnings / exceptions are aiming to inform the user of a possibly invalid
assignment. There may be false positives; situations where a chained assignment is inadvertently
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove the last sentence; this is actually not true. All purported false positive are actually user error (at least that have been reported)

#17505 Signed-off-by: Gábor Lipták <gliptak@gmail.com>
@gliptak
Copy link
Contributor Author

gliptak commented Oct 1, 2017

@jreback Please review.

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Oct 1, 2017

@gliptak gliptak closed this Oct 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2 participants