make HashTableSeparateChaining get and remove methods a little DRYer … #8
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…using do ... while instead of while loop
loiane added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2016
make HashTableSeparateChaining get and remove methods a little DRYer …
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…using do ... while instead of while loop
Hi Loiane! Thank you for taking a look at and merging my previous PR. Here's another one for you to consider. If you use a
do ... whileloop instead of just awhileloop in theget()andremove()methods you can make the code a little DRYer/succinct.do ... whileloops are somewhat obscure/less common, but I think can work well here. They will execute at least once, and evaluate their conditional at the bottom of the loop instead of at the top like most other loops.