Skip to content

Ugly fix for #153 #154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
dbroemmel wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Ugly fix for #153 #154

dbroemmel wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@dbroemmel
Copy link
Contributor

@dbroemmel dbroemmel commented Jul 4, 2023

This is a sort of brute-force workaround to avoid #153. Likely not up to the standard of fprettify but 'works-for-me'.
Test amended to cover the corner case, I think.
@dbroemmel
Ugly fix for fortran-lang#153
d1b4916 
This is a sort of brute-force workaround to avoid fortran-lang#153. Likely not up to the standard of `fprettify` but 'works-for-me'. Test amended to cover the corner case, I think.
@dbroemmel dbroemmel mentioned this pull request Apr 5, 2024
Open
@dbroemmel
Copy link
Contributor Author

dbroemmel commented Apr 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Resolves #153 and #168. The solution proposed in #168 seems much nicer though.
@dbroemmel
Implement nicer fix
727f27d 
Implement nicer fix from fortran-lang#168 and switch to previous test framework for older Python versions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant

@dbroemmel