DEV Community

Zhang Wei
Zhang Wei

Posted on

uBlock Origin in Chrome: Navigating the New Manifest V3 Landscape

Abstract

In this post, we explore the recent changes affecting the popular ad blocker uBlock Origin in Chrome. With Google’s new Manifest V3 coming into force by June 2025, many of uBlock Origin’s advanced features will be limited on Chrome. We discuss the background, core concepts, practical applications, and challenges of these changes. We also touch on alternative ad blockers, browser switching options, and the exciting interplay between open-source licensing and Web3 innovations. Read on for a comprehensive technical yet accessible overview that will help users navigate this evolving ecosystem.

Introduction

The digital advertising ecosystem is constantly evolving, with users demanding seamless browsing experiences and robust privacy protection. uBlock Origin has long been heralded as a top ad blocker that strikes the right balance between speed and security. However, Google’s transition to Manifest V3 is poised to change the way ad blockers work on Chrome. In this post, we dive deep into the technical and practical implications of this shift. We also provide useful alternatives, explain the role of open-source licensing in building trust, and explore future innovations such as Web3 integration.

Background and Context

The Rise of uBlock Origin

uBlock Origin, available at uBlock Origin, is an open-source ad and tracker blocker that many users have relied on to enhance their privacy. Its lightweight design and effectiveness made it a popular choice for blocking unwanted ads, popups, and trackers, thereby enhancing browsing speed and protecting user data.

What is Manifest V3?

Google’s Manifest V3 is a new extension framework designed to improve Chrome’s speed, privacy, and security. As detailed by Chrome Extensions: Migrate to Manifest V3, the update restricts certain APIs—most notably the webRequest API—that have been critical for ad blockers like uBlock Origin. Instead, Chrome will use the declarativeNetRequest API, which offers a more limited set of features. This change was first introduced in 2023 and, as reported by The Verge, has started disabling some uBlock Origin functionalities.

Open-Source Licensing and Trust

One of the pillars of uBlock Origin’s success is its open-source nature. Licensed under the GNU General Public License v3, its code transparency has built significant trust among users and developers. Open-source licensing, as discussed by the EFF on Open Source, ensures that anyone can audit, modify, and improve the software, fostering a community of shared innovation.

Core Concepts and Features

The transformation from Manifest V2 to V3 has several key implications for ad blockers:

  • API Limitations:

    The classic webRequest API allowed dynamic, real-time control over network requests. With Manifest V3, this functionality is curtailed, pushing developers to adopt the more restricted declarativeNetRequest API. Developers of uBlock Origin have already explored alternatives, such as the experimental uBlock Origin Minus extension.

  • Reduced Functionality in uBlock Origin Lite:

    uBlock Origin Lite is a pared-down version developed to meet Manifest V3 requirements. While it continues to block basic ads, it lacks key features like cosmetic filtering. Users staying on Chrome may experience gaps in ad blocking efficiency compared to the full version on browsers that still support Manifest V2.

  • Browser Compatibility and Alternatives:

    Manifest V3 is not exclusive to Chrome. Other Chromium-based browsers, such as Edge and Vivaldi, now also adhere to these restrictions. Alternative ad blockers such as Adblock Plus, AdGuard, and Ghostery have developed Manifest V3 compatible versions.

  • Privacy vs. Functionality Debate:

    uBlock Origin’s full power is available on browsers like Firefox and LibreWolf, which continue to support a broader range of extension APIs. Users may choose to switch browsers if they require the full ad blocking capabilities.

Comparison Table of Browsers & Ad Blockers

Below is a table summarizing the current landscape:

Browser/Ad Blocker Manifest V3 Compatible Key Features Limitations
Chrome (uBlock Origin Lite) Yes Basic ad blocking No cosmetic filtering
Chromium-Based Alternatives (AdGuard, Ghostery, Adblock Plus) Yes Limited filtering options Reduced dynamic blocking
Firefox & LibreWolf (uBlock Origin) Not impacted by Manifest V3 Full functionality, open-source ethos Requires switching browser
Brave Custom Shields (bypass limitations) Integrated ad blocking with Web3 rewards Different user experience

Applications and Use Cases

Here are some practical scenarios where users must decide between staying with Chrome or switching to an alternative browser:

  • Scenario 1: Privacy-Focused Users

    Privacy enthusiasts who depend on comprehensive blocking of ads, trackers, and cosmetic elements will find that switching to Firefox or LibreWolf provides the full suite of uBlock Origin features. These browsers not only ensure robust ad blocking but also adhere to a transparent open-source model, building user trust.

  • Scenario 2: Users Tied to Chrome Ecosystem

    Some users may prefer to continue using Chrome due to its deep integration with Google’s suite of services. For these individuals, opting for Manifest V3 compliant alternatives such as uBlock Origin Lite or combining multiple ad blockers can partially mitigate the loss in functionality. It is important to test these on key websites to ensure acceptable performance.

  • Scenario 3: Embracing Web3 Innovations

    Browsers like Brave take a different approach by integrating Web3 capabilities along with ad blocking. Brave not only shields users from unwanted content but also introduces an innovative system where users can earn tokens like the Basic Attention Token (BAT). As Web3 grows, such hybrid models may appeal to both ad blocker users and cryptocurrency enthusiasts.

Challenges and Limitations

While Manifest V3 aims to enhance security and performance, several challenges have emerged:

  • Loss of Dynamic Blocking:

    Users are already reporting that advanced cosmetic filtering—for instance, hiding specific ad spaces—may no longer be possible on Chrome. This compromises user experience on websites that rely on non-intrusive ad placements.

  • Performance Trade-offs:

    Although Manifest V3 was designed to boost browser speed and security, the inherent limitations on advanced ad blocking could result in mixed performance for privacy-conscious users. Some may find that alternative ad blockers are less effective in discovering new or region-specific ads.

  • Adoption and Community Resistance:

    The changes have sparked debate among developers and open-source communities. Articles like Google Chrome’s uBlock Origin phaseout has begun highlight the resistance from a community that values the full control uBlock Origin once offered. Additionally, support for Manifest V2 will cease by June 2025, putting considerable pressure on both developers and end users.

  • Limitations for Enterprise Environments:

    Businesses relying on legacy extensions face operational challenges. Any shift to Manifest V3 requires thorough testing to ensure that productivity tools and privacy measures remain intact.

Future Outlook and Innovations

Despite these challenges, the evolution of Manifest V3 opens the door for future innovations:

  • Web3 Integration:

    The increased focus on decentralized technologies and blockchain could herald new approaches to ad blocking and user privacy. For example, browsers like Brave are already merging ad blocking with Web3 benefits by offering token rewards for attention. As Brave Wallet and NFT marketplaces gain traction, new models may emerge where users can even “own” their ad preferences through digital tokens.

  • Rethinking Open-Source Licensing:

    With platforms like License Token advocating for innovative funding and licensing models, we may see more projects adopting open-source formats combined with blockchain-based funding (Open Compensation Token License). Such models can incentivize developers while maintaining transparency and community trust.

  • Enhanced Interoperability:

    Future technologies may bridge the gap between Manifest V3 limitations and legacy ad blocking features. As cross-chain interoperability becomes more commonplace—exemplified by projects like Arbitrum and Ethereum interoperability—there is hope for tools that enjoy both high performance and rich features.

  • Developer and Community Support:

    The open-source community remains resilient and innovative. As seen in discussions on platforms like Dev.to, many developers are actively exploring alternative models for funding, developer compensation, and sustainable open-source licensing. These models may well shape the future of ad blocking and browser security.

Additional Resources and Related Reading

For those interested in a deeper dive into related topics, consider exploring the following links:

Practical Tips for Users

Here is a bullet list of actionable items if you are affected by these changes:

  • Test Alternatives:

    Experiment with uBlock Origin Lite, Adblock Plus, AdGuard, and Ghostery to see which suits your browsing habits best.

  • Consider Browser Switch:

    If full functionality is a priority, consider switching to Firefox or LibreWolf, where uBlock Origin remains fully functional.

  • Stay Informed:

    Keep an eye on official announcements from Chrome and open-source communities regarding updates, bug fixes, and new funding models.

  • Engage with Developers:

    Participate in forums and GitHub discussions to contribute ideas for transitioning to Manifest V3.

Developer Insights and Community Perspectives

Recent posts on Dev.to have also touched on similar issues that arose when technical changes impact open-source communities. For example:

These community discussions underscore the importance of collaborative innovation as the landscape changes.

Summary

In conclusion, the shift to Manifest V3 represents a significant turning point for ad blockers like uBlock Origin on Chrome. While the update enhances security and performance in some areas, it also limits advanced features that have long been the hallmark of tools like uBlock Origin. Users must weigh the benefits of staying with Chrome using alternatives such as uBlock Origin Lite against switching to more privacy-focused browsers like Firefox or LibreWolf that support the full feature set.

Moreover, the interplay between open-source licensing and emerging Web3 innovations promises an exciting future. With decentralized funding models and blockchain-based rewards (as seen in Brave’s ecosystem), developers can sustain innovation despite these technical limitations. The community-driven spirit of open-source initiatives remains a powerful force in ensuring transparency, sustainability, and user empowerment.

Key Takeaways:

  • Understanding Manifest V3: The change in APIs directly affects ad blocking capabilities.
  • Alternative Solutions: Users have several options—from uBlock Origin Lite on Chrome to switching to Firefox.
  • Future Innovations: Blockchain, Web3 rewards, and new funding models may redefine the future of ad blocking and open-source development.
  • Community Commitment: The resilience and creativity of the open-source community are crucial in overcoming these emerging challenges.

As we move toward a future where new standards and decentralized technologies become more prominent, it is essential that both users and developers remain adaptable. Whether through improved browser alternatives or innovative funding mechanisms for open-source projects, the ecosystem is evolving—and with it, our approach to privacy, security, and online freedom.

For a deeper look at these issues, revisit the Original Article on uBlock Origin in Chrome and explore how the community is responding to new challenges with determination and collaborative innovation.


By understanding the complex interactions of technology, privacy, and open-source models, we empower ourselves to make better-informed decisions in this rapidly evolving digital landscape. Keep testing, keeping informed, and keep pushing for a safer, more private internet.

Top comments (0)