Agentic AI — systems that operate autonomously to complete multi-step tasks — are rapidly gaining attention. They promise automation, efficiency, and scalability. But with that power comes a fundamental concern: What happens when the agent goes too far, too fast, in the wrong direction?
The Isolation Problem
Agentic systems, by definition, act independently. They’re often given a goal ("Book me a vacation") and a broad action space ("Use any tools available"). They can take dozens or hundreds of steps without human involvement. This creates a troubling isolation effect:
- No built-in pausing for feedback
- No intermediate approvals
- No guarantee that its actions align with user intent after the initial prompt
It’s the digital equivalent of hiring an intern, giving them a vague goal, and not checking in until they’ve already spent the entire budget on the wrong thing.
Why Control Matters
Autonomy without oversight is dangerous, especially when:
- Context shifts mid-task: Maybe you decide halfway through you want a beach vacation instead of a ski trip.
- The AI misunderstands priorities: You wanted affordability, but it optimized for luxury.
- It oversteps boundaries: Accessing data, triggering workflows, or emailing contacts you didn’t intend it to.
Most current agent frameworks (e.g., AutoGPT, OpenAgents, MetaGPT) are designed to go, not to ask. That’s a problem.
What's Missing: Interruptibility and Feedback
Humans need to be able to pause, observe, and redirect. We need agentic systems to:
- Expose their plans before executing Think: a plan preview like a GPS shows your route.
- Support step-by-step mode Like debugging a script — approve each step, or set checkpoints.
- Allow injected feedback mid-task A “hey, stop, change direction” signal should override the default behavior.
Right now, most agent systems treat tasks as atomic. Either you trust the agent, or you don't use it. That’s a false binary. We need graded autonomy — sliding scales between full manual control and full automation.
Reframing the Agent
Agentic AI should be designed less like a robot, more like a junior collaborator:
- Always ready to ask: “Does this still make sense?”
- Willing to pause and review with you
- Capable of deferring to human judgment at critical forks
Until then, the promise of autonomous agents will remain brittle. Power without oversight is not just risky — it’s a liability.
Top comments (0)