I've been coding for over a decade, and I can count on one hand the number of times a project manager has made my life easier. That's not a dig at PMs personally—some of my best colleagues have been project managers. The problem is the system, not the people.
Last week, I spent three hours updating Jira tickets instead of fixing the authentication bug that was causing our mobile app to break. Three hours of my day, gone, because someone needed a "status update" on work that was happening in real-time on GitHub. If you've ever felt this frustration, you're not alone.
Here's the thing that drives me crazy: we're supposed to be the industry that automates everything, yet we're still manually updating spreadsheets about our work as if it were 1995.
The Real Problem
We're Not Anti-Planning, We're Anti-Busywork
I love planning. I spend hours architecting solutions, thinking through edge cases, and mapping out dependencies to ensure optimal performance. What I hate is explaining to someone why fixing a "simple" UI bug requires updating three different services and migrating a database table.
The worst part? After spending 30 minutes writing up this explanation in ticket format, I was asked the same question in the next standup. Then again, in Slack. Then in an email marked "urgent."
Teamcamp Project Management Tool for Dev team Signup Now
The Tools Are Fighting Each Other (And Us)
My current project uses Jira for tracking, Slack for communication, GitHub for code reviews, Figma for designs, and Confluence for documentation. That's five different places I need to check to understand what I'm supposed to be working on.
Yesterday, I got conflicting information from three different sources about the same feature. The Jira ticket stated one thing, the Slack thread said another, and the actual requirements document (buried somewhere in Confluence) indicated something completely different.
This isn't project management—it's project chaos.
How Bad PM Destroys Productivity
The Interruption Tax Is Real
You know that feeling when you're deep in a complex problem, everything finally makes sense, and then... ding. "Quick question about the header component."
What should be a two-minute answer turns into twenty minutes of context switching. First, I need to remember where I was in my code. Then I need to understand what they're asking (because "quick question" is never quick). Then I need to locate the relevant files, provide context, and return to my original task.
Except now I've forgotten why I was refactoring that function in the first place.
Death by a Thousand Status Updates
I swear, sometimes I spend more time discussing work than actually doing it: daily stand-ups, weekly retrospectives, monthly planning sessions, and quarterly reviews. Don't get me wrong—some meetings are valuable. However, when I spend eight hours a week in meetings about work, that's eight hours I'm not writing code.
And here's the kicker: most of these meetings could be asynchronous updates. The information I share in standup is usually already visible in my commits and pull requests. However, we still need to gather in a room (or on Zoom) and verbally repeat what's already documented.
The Estimation Game
"How long will this take?" It's the question that haunts every developer's dreams.
Here's what non-technical people don't understand: software development isn't like building a house, where you know exactly how many bricks you need. It's more like exploring a cave where you discover new passages and unexpected challenges at every turn.
That "simple" feature might take two days if everything goes perfectly. Alternatively, it might take two weeks if we discover that the existing architecture can't support it, the third-party API has undocumented rate limits, and the database requires restructuring.
But project management tools want a number. So we guess. Then we get held accountable for our guesses as if they were commitments.
What Works (From Someone Who's Been There)
Start With the Code, Not the Process
The best project management I've experienced started with understanding how developers work. Instead of forcing us to adapt to some theoretical framework, they built processes around our existing workflows.
For example, instead of separate story points and time estimates, we started tracking cycle time—how long features take from start to finish. This provided us with real data for planning, rather than made-up numbers.
Embrace Asynchronous Everything
The best teams I've worked on rarely had mandatory meetings. Most communication happened asynchronously through well-organized channels where people could contribute when they had something valuable to add.
Status updates? Automated from GitHub. Questions about requirements? Documented in a shared space where the answers could help future team members. Decisions? Made transparently with clear reasoning that everyone could reference later.
Make Information Findable
I shouldn't need to ask three different people to understand what I'm building. The requirements, context, and constraints—all of these should be easily accessible and up to date.
The teams that get this right have a single source of truth for project information. Not scattered across multiple tools, not buried in meeting notes, not locked in someone's head.
Tools That Don't Suck (Yes, They Exist)
What We Need
After years of using terrible project management tools, I've figured out what matters:
Integration with development tools: If it doesn't connect to GitHub, it's useless. I want my commits to update the project status automatically. I want my pull requests to link to requirements. I want deployments to trigger notifications.
Intelligent automation: Stop requiring manual updates for information that the computer already knows. If I close a GitHub issue, I will mark the task as done. If I deployed to staging, update the status. If tests are failing, flag it automatically.
Context, not just tasks: I need to understand not just what to build, but why. Who requested this feature? What problem does it solve? What happens if we don't build it? This context enables me to make more informed technical decisions.
Respect for developer workflows: Some of us work better in long, focused blocks. Others prefer shorter iterations. Good tools adapt to how we work, not the other way around.
Why Teamcamp Gets It
I've tried probably a dozen project management tools over the years, and most of them felt like they were designed by people who'd never written a line of code. Teamcamp is different because it starts with understanding developer workflows and builds project management around that.
Instead of forcing you to update multiple systems, it connects directly to your development tools and automatically keeps stakeholders informed. Instead of generic task lists, it provides the technical context developers need to make good decisions.
The result? I spend less time managing projects and more time building features. My non-technical colleagues get better visibility into our work without constantly interrupting us. Everyone wins.
Fixing Your Team's PM Problems (Step by Step)
Step 1: Measure the Pain
Before you can fix the problem, you need to understand the extent of the issue. For one week, track how much time your developers spend on:
- Updating project management tools
- Status meetings and check-ins
- Answering questions about work in progress
- Context switching between communication channels
I guarantee you'll be shocked by the numbers. Most teams discover developers are spending 25-40% of their time on project management overhead.
Step 2: Automate the Obvious Stuff
Look for places where humans are manually updating information that computers already know:
- Use GitHub webhooks to update project status when code is committed
- Automatically generate progress reports from actual work completed
- Set up smart notifications that only interrupt when something needs attention
- Connect deployment pipelines to project tracking so stakeholders know when features are live
Step 3: Consolidate Your Communication
Pick fewer tools and use them better:
- One place for project requirements and context
- One place for technical discussions
- One place for status updates
- Clear guidelines about what goes where
The goal isn't to eliminate all communication—it's to make communication more effective and less disruptive.
Step 4: Focus on Outcomes, Not Activities
Stop tracking hours and start tracking results:
- How quickly do we deliver value to users?
- How often do we have to fix bugs after release?
- How satisfied are developers with the development process?
- How well do we estimate and plan work?
These metrics tell you much more about project health than time tracking ever will.
Making It Stick
Get Developer Buy-In
The biggest mistake I see is implementing new project management processes without involving the people who will use them. Developers have strong opinions about tools and workflows—and for good reason. We're the ones who have to live with these decisions every day.
Include developers in tool selection. Ask for feedback during process changes. Most importantly, be willing to admit when something isn't working and try a different approach.
Start Small, Iterate Fast
Don't try to fix everything at once. Pick one pain point—maybe it's too many status meetings or information scattered across multiple tools—and focus on improving that first.
Measure the results. If it's working, expand it. If it's not, try something else. The same iterative approach we use for software development also works for process improvement.
Remember Why We're Here
The goal isn't perfect project management—it's shipping great software that solves real problems for real people. Any process that gets in the way of that goal needs to be questioned, refined, or scrapped entirely.
The best project management is invisible. It provides the structure and information teams need to do their best work without getting in the way of actually doing that work.
Ready to Fix Your Team's PM Problems?
If your development team is drowning in project management overhead, you don't have to accept it as the price of doing business. There are better ways to coordinate work, track progress, and keep stakeholders informed—ways that enhance developer productivity rather than hinder it.
Want more insights on building better development teams? I write about developer productivity, team dynamics, and the tools that make a difference. Subscribe to get new posts delivered to your inbox.
Top comments (0)