DEV Community

Swiftproxy - Residential Proxies
Swiftproxy - Residential Proxies

Posted on

Puppeteer vs Selenium: Which One Should You Use

#puppeteer #selenium

Automation tools power today’s web development and testing—but which one deserves your attention? Puppeteer, launched just five years ago, has rapidly gained traction for its speed and simplicity. Selenium, around since 2004, remains the heavyweight champion—trusted, versatile, and battle-tested.
Choosing between them can be tricky. So, let’s break down exactly what sets them apart. By the end, you’ll know which tool fits your project perfectly.

Puppeteer vs Selenium

Puppeteer supports only JavaScript and works with Chrome/Chromium, limiting browser options. Selenium supports many languages like Java, Python, and C#, and works across all major browsers.
Puppeteer is easy to set up via npm and runs faster, while Selenium’s setup is more complex and generally slower. Puppeteer handles both web and mobile automation; Selenium focuses on web only.
Puppeteer offers built-in performance tools like screenshots and PDFs, whereas Selenium’s tools are limited. Selenium supports recording interactions via Selenium IDE, which Puppeteer lacks.

What Is Puppeteer Good For

Puppeteer is a Node.js library created by Google to provide deep control over Chrome and Chromium browsers using the DevTools protocol. It’s laser-focused on JavaScript developers who want speed and simplicity.

Use Puppeteer for:

  • Testing Chrome extensions quickly.
  • Taking screenshots or generating PDFs during UI testing.
  • Automating form submissions, clicks, and keyboard inputs.
  • Web scraping dynamic content from sites reliant on JavaScript.
  • Running tests on the latest Chromium versions without fuss.

If you live in the JavaScript ecosystem and your focus is Chrome, Puppeteer is a strong contender.

Why Rely on Selenium for Automation

Selenium is a mature, flexible framework supporting multiple browsers and programming languages. This flexibility is its superpower. Whether your team codes in Python, Java, or Ruby, Selenium adapts.

Key Selenium components:

  • WebDriver: Direct browser automation.
  • IDE: Record and replay test cases.
  • Grid: Run tests on multiple machines and browsers simultaneously.

Common uses include:

  • Cross-browser web app testing.
  • Performance and load testing.
  • Automated UI testing.
  • Data scraping, especially when you need multi-browser support.

If your projects demand diversity in browsers or languages, Selenium is hard to beat.

Pros and Cons

Puppeteer Advantages

  • Direct access to Chrome’s DevTools for granular control.
  • Speed — Puppeteer is noticeably faster than Selenium.
  • Minimal dependencies; no separate browser drivers needed.
  • Built-in performance metrics and screenshot/PDF support.

Puppeteer Drawbacks

  • Locked to Chrome/Chromium.
  • JavaScript-only.

Selenium Advantages

  • Supports all major browsers and platforms.
  • Works with a wide range of programming languages.
  • Rich ecosystem with WebDriver, IDE, and Grid.
  • CI/CD integration-friendly.

Selenium Drawbacks

  • Setup is complex, especially for beginners.
  • Lacks built-in performance tools.
  • Can feel heavy and slower for simple tasks.

Setting Up and Web Scraping

Both Puppeteer and Selenium excel at controlling browsers programmatically. Here’s a side-by-side example of scraping dynamic quotes from a JavaScript-rendered page.

Installation

Puppeteer:

npm install puppeteer
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Selenium:

npm install selenium-webdriver npm install chromedriver
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Launching Chrome (headless mode)

Puppeteer:

const browser = await puppeteer.launch({ headless: true }); const page = await browser.newPage(); await page.goto(url);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Selenium:

let driver = await new Builder().forBrowser('chrome') .setChromeOptions(new chrome.Options().headless()) .build(); await driver.get(url);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Waiting for dynamic content

Puppeteer:

await page.waitForSelector('.quote');
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Selenium:

await driver.wait(until.elementLocated(By.className('quote')));
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Extracting quotes

Puppeteer:

let quotes = await page.evaluate(() => { return Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('.quote .text')) .map(el => el.innerText).join('\n'); }); console.log(quotes);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Selenium:

let quoteElements = await driver.findElements(By.className('quote')); let quotes = ''; for (let el of quoteElements) { let text = await el.findElement(By.className('text')).getText(); quotes += text + '\n'; } console.log(quotes);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Closing the browser

Puppeteer:

await browser.close();
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Selenium:

await driver.quit();
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Which One Is Right for You

If your project targets only Chrome and you want speed and simplicity, Puppeteer is your friend. It’s lean, fast, and built with modern JavaScript workflows in mind.
But if you need cross-browser compatibility, or your team codes in multiple languages, Selenium remains the gold standard. Its robust ecosystem and wide browser support make it indispensable for complex testing environments.

Final Thoughts

Both Puppeteer and Selenium are excellent tools, and your choice depends on your project’s needs. If you want fast, Chrome-only, JavaScript-driven automation, Puppeteer is the way to go. For support across diverse browsers, multiple languages, and complex test scenarios, Selenium is the better choice. Whichever you pick, you will enhance your browser automation capabilities.

Top comments (0)