DEV Community

Shrijith Venkatramana
Shrijith Venkatramana

Posted on

Gatsby or Astro: Picking the Right Tool for Content-Heavy Websites

#webdev #programming #javascript #beginners

Hi, I'm Shrijith Venkatramana. Right now, I'm building on an aggregation of 50,000+ resources on my site Free DevTools. This site hosts many free developer tools, manuals, cheatsheets and icon sets - which you can download or use without any login. Do give it a try here

When building websites focused on content like blogs, documentation sites, or portfolios, Gatsby and Astro stand out as popular choices. Both frameworks help developers create fast, modern sites, but they differ in architecture, performance, and flexibility. This post breaks down their key aspects to help you decide which fits your project.

Inside Gatsby: Static Sites with React Power

Gatsby is a static site generator built on React. It pulls in data from various sources during build time and generates HTML files. This means your site loads quickly since everything is pre-rendered.

Key features include:

  • GraphQL for data querying: Gatsby uses GraphQL to fetch content from Markdown, APIs, or CMS like Contentful.
  • Plugin ecosystem: Thousands of plugins for SEO, image optimization, and more.
  • React components: Build dynamic UIs while keeping the site static.

For a simple blog setup in Gatsby, start by installing it globally:

npm install -g gatsby-cli gatsby new my-gatsby-blog https://github.com/gatsbyjs/gatsby-starter-blog cd my-gatsby-blog gatsby develop # Output: Server starts at http://localhost:8000
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In src/pages/index.js, you can query posts:

import React from "react" import { graphql } from "gatsby" export default function Home({ data }) { return ( <div> <h1>Blog Posts</h1> {data.allMarkdownRemark.nodes.map(node => ( <div key={node.id}> <h2>{node.frontmatter.title}</h2> <p>{node.excerpt}</p> </div> ))} </div> ) } export const query = graphql` query { allMarkdownRemark { nodes { id frontmatter { title } excerpt } } } ` # Output: Renders a list of blog posts from Markdown files in content/blog
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Gatsby handles routing automatically and optimizes images via plugins like gatsby-image. Check the official docs for more on data sourcing: Gatsby Data Layer.

Astro's Core: Islands of Interactivity

Astro focuses on shipping less JavaScript by default. It renders pages to HTML at build time but allows "islands" of interactive components from frameworks like React or Vue.

Standout points:

  • Framework-agnostic: Mix components from different libraries without lock-in.
  • Partial hydration: Only hydrate interactive parts, keeping the rest static.
  • Content collections: Built-in support for Markdown and MDX with schema validation.

To set up a basic Astro site:

npm create astro@latest my-astro-blog --template blog cd my-astro-blog npm run dev # Output: Server runs at http://localhost:4321
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

For displaying content, use collections in src/content/config.ts:

import { z, defineCollection } from 'astro:content'; const blogCollection = defineCollection({ schema: z.object({ title: z.string(), date: z.date(), }), }); export const collections = { blog: blogCollection, }; # Output: Defines schema for blog posts in src/content/blog
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Then, in src/pages/index.astro:

--- import { getCollection } from 'astro:content'; const posts = await getCollection('blog'); --- <html lang="en"> <head> <title>Blog</title> </head> <body> <h1>Posts</h1> <ul> {posts.map(post => ( <li> <a href={`/blog/${post.slug}`}>{post.data.title}</a> </li> ))} </ul> </body> </html> # Output: Generates a static index page listing blog posts
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Astro's syntax mixes HTML with JavaScript expressions. For deeper dives, see Astro Content Collections.

Speed and Performance: Where They Differ

Performance is crucial for content sites with images and text. Gatsby pre-builds everything, leading to fast initial loads but longer build times for large sites. Astro often builds faster since it avoids bundling unused JS.

In benchmarks, Astro sites can load 20-50% faster due to minimal client-side code. Gatsby shines with its image processing, reducing file sizes automatically.

Here's a quick comparison table:

Aspect Gatsby Astro
Build Time Supports Incremental Builds No real incremental builds
Render Time Slower for big sites (full React bundle) Faster, selective rendering
Page Load Speed Excellent with pre-rendering Superior with zero-JS default
Bundle Size Larger if interactive Smaller, islands only

Test your own site with tools like Lighthouse. For Gatsby optimizations, refer to Gatsby Performance Guide.

Managing Content Sources Effectively

Both handle content from Markdown, but Gatsby integrates deeply with CMS via plugins. Astro uses file-based routing and collections for simplicity.

In Gatsby, connect to a headless CMS like Sanity:

Install plugin: npm install gatsby-source-sanity

Add to gatsby-config.js:

module.exports = { plugins: [ { resolve: `gatsby-source-sanity`, options: { projectId: 'your-project-id', dataset: 'production', }, }, ], } // Output: Pulls Sanity data into GraphQL layer for querying
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Query in pages as before.

Astro fetches external data at build time or via endpoints. For Markdown, it's native—no plugins needed.

Bold tip: If your site grows to hundreds of pages, Astro's content collections prevent schema errors early.

Setup and Daily Workflow Comparison

Gatsby requires Node.js and familiarity with React. Setup involves configuring plugins in gatsby-config.js.

Astro's CLI is straightforward, with less boilerplate. You edit .astro files directly, which feels like enhanced HTML.

Developer pain points:

  • Gatsby: Debugging GraphQL can be tricky for beginners.
  • Astro: Learning islands if you need interactivity.

Both support hot module replacement for fast dev servers. Astro often feels lighter for quick iterations.

Built-in SEO and Accessibility Tools

SEO is baked into both. Gatsby generates sitemaps and meta tags via plugins like gatsby-plugin-sitemap.

Astro handles SEO with frontmatter in pages:

--- title: 'My Post' description: 'A description here' ---
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Key difference: Gatsby's React base makes dynamic meta tags easier for personalized content.

For accessibility, both encourage semantic HTML, but Astro's static focus reduces JS-related issues.

Explore Astro's SEO features: Astro SEO Guide.

Ecosystem Strength: Plugins and Community

Gatsby boasts over 2,500 plugins, covering themes to e-commerce. Its community is mature, with many starters.

Astro's ecosystem is growing fast, with integrations for major frameworks. It has fewer plugins but emphasizes composability.

If you're in the React world, Gatsby feels like home. Astro appeals for multi-framework projects.

Community forums: Gatsby has active Slack; Astro uses Discord.

Making the Choice Based on Your Needs

Consider your project's scale. For highly interactive content sites with heavy data integration, Gatsby provides robust tools through its GraphQL layer and plugins—ideal if you're already using React.

Opt for Astro if you prioritize speed and minimal JS, especially for mostly static content with spots of interactivity. It's great for migrating from older static generators or starting fresh with flexibility.

Test both with a prototype: Spin up a small blog in each and measure build times, load speeds, and ease of adding features. Your team's skills matter too—React devs lean Gatsby, while HTML/JS purists prefer Astro.

Ultimately, both deliver excellent content-driven sites, so align with your performance goals and workflow preferences.

Top comments (0)