When you think of web application security testing, Burp Suite is often the first tool that comes to mind. It’s been a trusted ally for security professionals for years, offering flexibility and deep manual testing options that many penetration testers rely on. It deserves that reputation—few tools have shaped web security practices as much as Burp.
But the way we build and ship software is changing. DevSecOps workflows are about speed and automation: smaller release cycles, API-first architecture, and continuous integration pipelines. In this new environment, I realized that while Burp Suite continued to serve certain needs, my team also wanted something designed to slot smoothly into automated pipelines, reduce manual overhead, and help developers prioritize real risks without drowning in noise.
That’s how I came across ZeroThreat—a platform that doesn’t replace Burp Suite but complements it by filling critical gaps for fast-moving development teams.
The Shift in Application Security Needs
According to Wikipedia, application security has become increasingly about scalability, automation, and real-time collaboration. Gartner even predicts that by 2026, over 70% of enterprises will integrate DevSecOps practices to cope with modern software delivery speeds.
This shift means security tools aren’t only for penetration testers—they’re also for developers, QA teams, and cloud engineers who need actionable insights directly in their workflows. The challenge isn’t just finding vulnerabilities anymore—it’s prioritizing them quickly and resolving them efficiently.
Why Teams Look Beyond a Single Tool
Burp Suite excels at what it was built for: in-depth, manual security analysis. But teams now face additional demands:
- Rapid CI/CD cycles where manual scans slow things down
- Expanding API surfaces that need consistent monitoring
- The need for AI assistance when triaging thousands of findings
- Cross-team collaboration between devs, security, and operations
These are less about replacing Burp Suite, and more about incorporating fresh approaches that support DevSecOps pipelines. That’s where ZeroThreat entered the picture for our team.
How ZeroThreat Complements Traditional Tools
What stood out was how ZeroThreat positioned itself not as a replacement, but as a modern Burp Suite alternative built for automation-first workflows.
Here are the aspects that made a difference:
Automation at the Core: ZeroThreat offered plug-and-play scanning with no manual setup. Unlike configuring every test by hand, the scan was ready in minutes and could run automatically in pipelines.
AI-Powered Remediation: Instead of listing dozens of issues, ZeroThreat highlighted the most urgent and paired each one with code-level suggestions, making it actionable for developers with limited security expertise.
Near-Zero False Positives
Using AI models like GPT-4 Turbo allowed the system to reduce “noise,” a common frustration with many security tools. This meant less time sorting irrelevant logs and more time fixing real issues.API-First Security
From RESTful services to GraphQL, ZeroThreat helped identify broken access controls and sensitive data exposures without requiring custom scripting.Built for Collaboration: Teams could integrate findings into Jira, Slack, or GitHub issues so everyone stayed aligned without shifting to another platform.
A Developer’s Advantage: Real Use Case
Here’s how this played out for me. During a sprint, we introduced new API endpoints. ZeroThreat picked up inconsistent authorization checks through its API scanning and flagged them with remediation guidance referencing the exact CVE. Instead of reading vague reports, developers had specific, actionable steps with example code fixes.
What once required security back-and-forth now became a simple Jira ticket with a clear fix. Our release went ahead on schedule, without compromising security.
Why Both Have Their Role
It’s important to stress: Burp Suite continues to be a go-to for advanced penetration testers. Professional pen-testers often prefer it for hunting down complex, business-logic vulnerabilities where deep customization is needed.
ZeroThreat, on the other hand, shines when integrated into broader DevSecOps strategies, where repeatability, automation, and developer-first design matter most. The two are not in conflict—they can actually complement each other in the same workflow.
Building a Modern Security Workflow
If there’s one takeaway from my journey, it’s this: modern application security isn’t about choosing one tool to rule them all. It’s about building a toolkit that balances precision with efficiency.
Burp Suite helps you dig deep where it matters most, while ZeroThreat helps you scale and automate where speed is critical. Together, they align with the growing need for both manual expertise and AI-powered automation.
Top comments (0)