DEV Community

OBINexus
OBINexus

Posted on

Technical Specification: Isomorphic Binding Architecture

Core Philosophy: "All Bindings Are Drivers"

SQUARE (Perfect Binding): ┌────────────┐ │ │ All 4 sides equal │ Binding │ = Symmetric process │ │ = Bidirectional FFI └────────────┘ RECTANGLE (Driver): ┌──────────────────┐ │ │ 2 pairs of equal sides │ Driver │ = Asymmetric interface │ │ = Request/Response pairs └──────────────────┘ 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Polyglot Interaction Diagram

graph TD subgraph "LibPolyCall Core (C)" DRIVER[DRIVER Daemon<br/>Port 3005→8085] FFI[FFI Layer<br/>libpolycall.so] end subgraph "Language Bindings" COBOL[COBOL<br/>cbl-polycall] GO[Go<br/>gosilang] PY[Python<br/>py-polycall] JS[Node.js<br/>node-polycall] JAVA[Java<br/>java-polycall] end subgraph "Schema Transform" AST[AST Isomorphism<br/>Huffman-AVL] IR[Canonical IR] end COBOL -->|JCL/VSAM| FFI GO -->|struct{}| FFI PY -->|dict/tuple| FFI JS -->|JSON| FFI JAVA -->|Object| FFI FFI --> AST AST --> IR IR --> DRIVER 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Isomorphic Transform Rules

For your example {x: 20.5, y: 70}:

// Canonical Intermediate Representation (CIR) typedef struct { enum { FLOAT64, INT64, STRING, NESTED } type; union { double f64; int64_t i64; char* str; void* nested; } value; } CIR_Value; typedef struct { char* key; CIR_Value value; } CIR_Field; typedef struct { CIR_Field* fields; size_t field_count; } CIR_Object; 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Language-Specific Mappings

Language Native Type CIR Transform Driver Format
Python {"x": 20.5, "y": 70} CIR_Object Binary protocol
Go struct{X float64; Y int} CIR_Object Binary protocol
COBOL 01 POINT. 05 X PIC 9(2)V9. 05 Y PIC 9(2). CIR_Object Binary protocol
Java class Point{Float x; Integer y;} CIR_Object Binary protocol

Zero-Trust Protocol

Each binding registers with cryptographically-seeded GUID:

typedef struct { uint8_t seed[32]; // Cryptographic seed uint64_t session; // Session identifier uint32_t sequence; // Message sequence uint16_t checksum; // Data integrity } PolyCall_Header; 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Build Orchestration

The unified Makefile ensures all bindings compile to the same ABI:

POLYCALL_ABI = -fPIC -shared -Wl,-soname,lib$@.so.1 CANONICAL_IR = -DUSE_CANONICAL_IR=1 %.so: %.c $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(POLYCALL_ABI) $(CANONICAL_IR) $< -o $@ 
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

State Machine Mapping

Every cross-language call follows this state progression:

  1. Parse → Language-specific AST
  2. Transform → Canonical IR (lossless)
  3. Validate → Type coercion matrix
  4. Marshal → Binary protocol
  5. Route → DRIVER daemon
  6. Unmarshal → Target language
  7. Execute → Native invocation
  8. Return → Reverse transform

This ensures the "square perfect" binding where input/output maintain structural equivalence across all supported languages.

The key insight: by treating all bindings as drivers with paired interfaces (rectangle), we achieve the perfect square of bidirectional communication without data loss.

Top comments (0)