Why TypeScript Is Superior To JavaScript

Introduction

Have you ever spent hours chasing a bug, only to find it was caused by something as small as passing the wrong kind of data into a function? Or maybe you've refactored part of your codebase and held your breath, hoping you didn’t break something in a file you forgot even existed. This is where TypeScript shines. TypeScript gives developers what JavaScript doesn't: clarity, predictability, and peace of mind. It's like having a second pair of eyes on your code—constantly checking your logic, your types, and your assumptions before they cause real problems.

TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript, which means that TypeScript builds on the existing syntax and features of JavaScript while also having additional features like static typing. TypeScript is designed to help developers build and maintain large-scale applications more easily and with fewer errors. TypeScript's popularity continues to grow, with a stronger demand for TypeScript developers in the job market and the rise of TypeScript being connected to an increasing industry focus on type safety and robust code in large-scale applications. Its popularity is driven by benefits like:

• Early error detection: Catching errors during development, before the code is executed.
• Improved code quality and maintainability: Making code easier to read, refactor, and manage, especially in large projects.
• Enhanced tooling: Excellent editor integration, particularly with VS Code.

TypeScript was primarily designed for developers. Along with enhanced code quality and maintainability, an improved developer experience, scalability for large projects, and predictability and reduced runtime errors. TypeScript offers increased team collaboration because of TypeScript's static typing and clear type annotations. Code becomes more readable and easier for developers to understand, even for those unfamiliar with a specific section of the codebase.

Choosing JavaScript is like choosing a map over a GPS. Sure, you will get to your destination, but it requires careful attention and self-direction. You might get lost or make a wrong turn if you're not meticulous. Whereas TypeScript, on the other is a GPS that provides clear directions, alerts you to potential errors (aka going the wrong way), and helps you stay on track, making the journey safer and more efficient. This is especially helpful in unfamiliar or complex routes (aka large projects).

Typescript vs Javascript.

JavaScript is a dynamically-typed language, meaning variables can hold any type of data without explicit declaration, and their types can change during runtime. This offers flexibility but can lead to runtime errors when unexpected types are encountered. TypeScript, on the other hand, is a statically-typed superset of JavaScript. It adds optional static typing, allowing developers to explicitly define the types of variables, function parameters, and return values. This enables type-checking at compile time, catching potential type-related errors before the code runs.

Because TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript, that means that all valid JavaScript code is also valid TypeScript code. Some of their core similarities include: Variables, data types, operators, control flows, functions, and object-oriented programming. If you find that TypeScript isn’t the right fit for your workflow, there are plenty of alternatives, especially depending on your project goals. Other statically typed programming languages like C++, Java, and Rust might better suit your needs. Choosing the right language depends on factors like:

• Required performance and speed
• Scalability of the application
• Development timeline
• Your (or your team’s) familiarity with the language

While TypeScript brings many advantages, it does come with tradeoffs, such as a learning curve and potential incompatibility with some libraries. Ultimately, it's about choosing the tool that best aligns with your project and development experience. There tends to be a learning curve. Developers new to static typing may face an initial learning curve to understand and effectively utilize TypeScript's features, like type annotations and interfaces. Another disadvantage is incompatibility with libraries. While many libraries have TypeScript type definitions, some older or less popular libraries may lack them, requiring extra effort to integrate. TypeScript is also not a true replacement for JavaScript. TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript, meaning that it compiles down to plain JavaScript. It doesn't replace JavaScript entirely, but rather enhances it.

Core syntax/features.

function greet(user) { return "Hello, " + user.toUpperCase(); } console.log(greet("Kris")); // Works console.log(greet(123)); // Runtime error: user.toUpperCase is not a function function greet(user: string): string { return "Hello, " + user.toUpperCase(); } console.log(greet("Kris")); // Works console.log(greet(123)); // Compile-time error: Argument of type 'number' is not assignable to parameter of type 'string' 

This example proves why TypeScript is more effective because there will be early error detection - The second greet(123) call is flagged before the code runs, preventing runtime bugs.

One of TypeScript’s biggest strengths is its ability to catch compile-time errors—problems that are flagged before your code ever runs. This is different from runtime errors, which only show up after your program starts executing.

Let’s break it down:

Compile-Time Errors (TypeScript)

• Detected during development (before the app runs).
• Examples: passing the wrong data type, accessing a missing property, incorrect function signatures.
• Benefit: You catch mistakes early, often as you're typing, thanks to editor support and static type checking.
• Result: Fewer bugs make it to production, and debugging becomes easier.

Runtime Errors (JavaScript)

• Detected only after the code runs.
• Examples: trying to call .toUpperCase() on a number, referencing undefined, logic errors that crash the app mid-use.
• Drawback: These errors may go unnoticed until a user encounters them, potentially in production.
• Result: Debugging takes longer and can hurt the user experience.

Imagine building a chair:

• A compile-time check is like your blueprint telling you, “This screw doesn’t fit here.”
• A runtime error is like building the whole chair, sitting down, and watching it collapse.

TypeScript saves code!

Here is a great example of TypeScript saving a ton of headaches on a refactor. Let’s say we needed to pass down props to several components. So we added the new required field to our types, and our TypeScript errors LIGHT UP. We would be able to look at every usage of that component and make sure we added the correct prop to pass down. It would even show up to add the prop to our tests. Because TS errors out if we don't add the new prop, we would also feel more confident in our code changes, even though it was across so many files and usages. Without TS, we could have missed an instance where we’d have to add this prop and introduce a bug.

Why This Matters in Projects

In large-scale apps or team environments, catching mistakes early prevents chain-reaction bugs. If a teammate changes a shared function, TypeScript will instantly flag any incompatible usage across the codebase, before it breaks anything.

​​
Who Should Learn TypeScript?

If you're completely new to programming or aren’t already familiar with JavaScript, learning JavaScript may be best for you! Learning the fundamentals of JavaScript—like variables, functions, loops, and conditionals—is much easier without the extra layer of TypeScript’s type system. Once you're comfortable writing and reading JavaScript, transitioning to TypeScript will feel natural and much more rewarding. If you've already dabbled in JavaScript, built a few projects, or are starting to feel comfortable in it, give yourself a little challenge and learn TypeScript. It will deepen your understanding of how data flows through your application and help you write cleaner, safer, and more maintainable code. TypeScript is especially useful if you’re aiming to work on larger projects or contribute to teams in a professional setting.

Conclusion & Tips for learning this language/framework.

My experience with using TypeScript so far has made coding more enjoyable for me. I feel more in control of what my code is doing, and my workflow is much smoother, especially when debugging or refactoring. For example, there have been many times when a variable of the wrong type was passed into a function or a React component, causing unexpected behavior that was hard to trace. With TypeScript, those issues are caught immediately at compile time, which gives me greater confidence when working across multiple files. Its predictability makes it far easier to follow and reason through my code. There’s a bit of a learning curve with the stricter type system, but if you're already familiar with JavaScript, it won’t take long to pick up. I highly recommend adding TypeScript to your toolkit—it’ll make your codebase more robust and your development experience much smoother in the long run.

https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/intro.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCg4U1FzODs

https://www.codecademy.com/courses/learn-typescript

https://www.contentful.com/blog/typescript-vs-javascript-explaining-the-differences