Cluster struct returned from VirtualizationClustersList is not the same when using plain /api endpoint

[CRSylar]

Hi to everybody

I'm a first timer with Netbox so maybe i'm missing something
but i notice that if i use a plain http request to /api/virtualization/clusters
the clusters returned have a Site field

while using the library method VirtualizationClustersList(ctx).Execute() the returned clusters are missing this object...

can you point me in the right direction ? the docs are huge and maybe i'm looking at the wrong things.

i'll also report my basic use case, to be clear
i need to get the Site information from the clusterName, since the Site itself seems to not have the the clusters inside it i'm trying to take the cluster by name and use the Site object in it to then perform the query to retrieve the Site informations.

thanks

[nutgood]

Hi,

I'm not seeing a Site field returned from the API, are you sure you don't have a custom type ?

{ "id": 2, "url": "http://localhost:8000/api/virtualization/clusters/2/", "display_url": "http://localhost:8000/virtualization/clusters/2/", "display": "woosczpffd", "name": "woosczpffd", "type": { "id": 2, "url": "http://localhost:8000/api/virtualization/cluster-types/2/", "display": "xamwtfsvmw", "name": "xamwtfsvmw", "slug": "ankqnajtmx", "description": "" }, "group": null, "status": { "value": "active", "label": "Active" }, "tenant": { "id": 1, "url": "http://localhost:8000/api/tenancy/tenants/1/", "display": "Some Tenant", "name": "Some Tenant", "slug": "some-tenant", "description": "" }, "scope_type": null, "scope_id": null, "scope": null, "description": "", "comments": "", "tags": [], "custom_fields": {}, "created": "2025-02-19T16:44:54.885689Z", "last_updated": "2025-02-21T15:01:01.118149Z", "device_count": 0, "virtualmachine_count": 0, "allocated_vcpus": null, "allocated_memory": null, "allocated_disk": null }

[nutgood]

If you do have a custom field defined, then that's accessible through cluster.CustomFields["your_field_name"]

[CRSylar]

thanks, it was a customField ( but nobody told me )