This research paper compares classification algorithms for heart disease prediction using the Hungarian-14 heart disease dataset, identifying Naïve Bayes and RBF Network as the most accurate, each achieving 86% accuracy. Utilizing the WEKA tool, the study evaluates performance in terms of accuracy and processing time of several algorithms including logistic regression and decision tables. The findings indicate Naïve Bayes outperforms the others with a 0-second model building time, emphasizing the potential of combining classification techniques for improved results in heart disease detection.