100% found this document useful (2 votes)
551 views16 pages

Report - Google Form

The document is a group report analyzing Malaysian students' understanding and use of Web 2.0 in education. It includes an introduction on how student learning styles are changing with new digital tools. The group conducted a survey to determine how Malaysian students understand and view the role of Web 2.0 in education. The survey received 64 responses and found that most students are familiar with Web 2.0, commonly use tools like Google Docs and Wikipedia, and feel Web 2.0 is convenient and useful in their learning. Respondents suggested improving Internet access and promoting more use of Web 2.0 tools in schools.

Uploaded by

api-274668321
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
551 views16 pages

Report - Google Form

The document is a group report analyzing Malaysian students' understanding and use of Web 2.0 in education. It includes an introduction on how student learning styles are changing with new digital tools. The group conducted a survey to determine how Malaysian students understand and view the role of Web 2.0 in education. The survey received 64 responses and found that most students are familiar with Web 2.0, commonly use tools like Google Docs and Wikipedia, and feel Web 2.0 is convenient and useful in their learning. Respondents suggested improving Internet access and promoting more use of Web 2.0 tools in schools.

Uploaded by

api-274668321
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

GGGE1155

COMPUTERINEDUCATION
(GroupReport)
GroupMembers :
1. NurFatihahbintiAbdulRahman

A151131

2. A.S.NorFarahFadzilabintiIbrahim A151237
3. NurulAkmarbintiMohamadNoor

A150551


1.0Introduction
Studentlearningstylesarebeginningtochangewithincreasedaccesstomediaanddigital
devices(Dedeetal.,2007Restak,2003).Withtheevolutionofnewinteractiveandsocially
constructedWeb2.0toolsontheInternet,teachershaveaccesstoagreaternumberoffree
toolsforteachingandlearningsupport(Ajjan&Hartshorne,2008Anderson,2007
Maloney,2007OReilly,2005).Weoftenheardaboutusingandincludingtechnologyin
teachingandlearningprocess,thus,Web2.0inEducationisintroduced.UsingWeb2.0in
educationbasicallymeansusingtheWeb2.0toolssuchas,Blendspace,Voicethreadand
Polldaddyintheteachingandlearningprocess.Web2.0toolsrepresentonetoolusefulin
enhancinglearningaccessibilityandquality.
Inthisstudy,weanalyzedthecurrentuseandunderstandingofMalaysianstudentsinWeb
2.0.Aswearelivinginthe21stcentury,kidsnowadayspreferusingtechnologyinwhatever
theydo.Forexample,intheirlearningprocess.Lately,therearemoreschoolsthatinclude
technologyasapartoftheirlearningprocess.Wecanseethatstudentsaremoreinterestedin
theirstudieswhenevermediaisinvolved.IncludingWeb2.0inlearningisimportantto
increasestudentsinterestinstudying,tocreateonewhomfullyequippedwithknowledgein
termsofacademicandpracticalandproduceMalaysianswhoareversatile.
2.0LiteratureReview
AsecondgenerationoftheWorldWideWebthatisfocusedontheabilityforpeopleto
collaborateandshareinformationonline.Web2.0referstothetransitionfromstaticHTML
WebpagestoamoredynamicWebthatismoreorganizedandisbasedonservingWeb
applicationstousers.Itisalsorevolutionarynewwaysofcreating,collaborating,editingand
sharingusergeneratedcontentonline.
inserttheonefromslides

3.0ResearchObjectives
TodeterminehowdeepisthepeopleunderstandingtowardsWeb2.0inEducation
ToidentifywhatpeoplethinkabouthowfarWeb2.0contributeinMalaysiaeducation
ToidentifywhataretheiropinionsregardingWeb2.0inEducation.

4.0ResearchMethodology
Surveymethodologystudiesthesamplingofindividualunitsfromapopulationandthe
associatedsurveydatacollectiontechniques,suchasquestionnaireconstructionandmethods
forimprovingthenumberandaccuracyofresponsestosurveys.Pollsaboutpublicopinion,
publichealthsurveys,marketresearchsurveys,governmentsurveysandcensusesareall
examplesofquantitativeresearch.

Inthisresearch,weareusingquantitativeresearchandthemethodthatweusedisasurvey.
Wemakeaquestionnairethatconsistofeightquestionsanddistributedit.Wedistributedthe
questionnaireonlineusinggoogleform.Wedistributedtheonlinegoogleformtoour
classmatesandfellowfriends.Therespondentsneedtoanswerthequestiononline.We
gatheredourquestionnaireviagoogleformasgoogleformwillgiveusthenumberof
respondentsthathadansweredourquestionnaire.Googleformalsogivesusresultfromthe
answers.
Questions
Oursurveyformconsistsofeightquestionsthatthathasvarioustypethatarerangetype,yes
orno,multiplechoiceandopinionsquestions.
4.2Participants
Ourexpectationistogain80responsesbutweonlyreceived64responses.Ourrespondents
includemaleandfemalefromvariousuniversities.Wedidnotrestrictonlyrespondentsfrom
ouruniversityonlytheNationalUniversityofMalaysia,butalsotootheruniversitiesas

well.However,itfulfilltheregulationtoreceivearound30responses.Thereare58female
responseswhereasonly8maleresponses.
Next,theagerangeismajorityinthe18to20yearsoldwhichis73percent,whereasthere
arenoonefromtheagerange27yearsoldto29yearsold.Wethinkthatthisisbecausethe
youngeronesaremorelikelytospendmoretimeovertheInternet.

DataCollection
Forthisresearch,wehaveconductedasurveyonline,usingGoogleFormtocollectourdata.
UsingGoogleFormwillsaveupmuchofourtimebecausewedonothavetogooutand
meettherespondents,insteadweneedtojustpostthesurveyonsocialsites,andcollectthe
data.Wehavesuccessfullyreceived64respondentsfromdifferentbackground.

DataAnalysis
Basedontheresults,wecananalyseandsummarizetheresultintheformofpiecharts,graph
andalsopercentages.Wealsohavedonethecalculationsthatwehavegainfromthe
respondents.However,notallofourquestionscanbecalculatedthemean,onlyonequestion
whichistherangetypequestion.
Inthisprocessofanalysingthedata,wehavedividedtheworkintothreesincewehavethree
membersinagroup.Weusedchartsandgraphstomakesureouranalysisisaccurate.
Fromthissurvey,wearelookingforresponsesthatarecompatiblewithourobjectives.From
these,wewillhavetomakeaconclusionontheoverallsurvey.

Findings
Whatwearegoingtodiscussnowiswhatwegainedfromoursurvey.
Wehaveatotalofninequestions.Firstly,fromourfirstquestionthatask"Web2.0describes
WorldWideWebsitesthatusetechnologybeyondthestaticpagesofearlierWebsites"is
actuallyasimpledefinitionofWeb2.0.Weaskthistodeterminewhethertherespondents
knowaboutWeb2.0.Fromtheanswer,wecanseethatonly11percentofthemwhichis
about7outof64respondentsanswereditwrongly.itshowsthatalmosteveryoneknowsthe
basicinformationaboutWeb2.0.

Figure 1 above shows the responses for Q1

WealsoaskedthemabouthowdidtheydiscoveraboutWeb2.0.61percentofthemsaidthat
theyknowaboutWeb2.0fromtheirfriends,39percentfromthesearchenginesuchas
Google,Yahooandmanymore.31percentansweredthattheyknowfromschool.While27

percentoftherespondentsknowitfrommediasuchastelevision,radioandother.Lastbut
notleast,6percentansweredtheyknowaboutWeb2.0fromothers.

Figure 2 above shows the responses for Q2

Forquestionthree,thequestionis"HowoftendoyouuseWeb2.0inyourlearning
process?".Thisisarangetypequestionsandthereare64responses.Thehighestresponsesis
5percentandabovetimesperweekanswerasitis39percent.Itwasagreedby25percentof
therespondents.Meanwhile,thelowestresponsesare0,andthereisalso14percentandwas
answeredby4respondents.

Figure 3 above shows the responses for Q3

Figure 4 above shows the responses for Q4

Question4is"HowfardoyouthinkWeb2.0contributeinMalaysianEducation?".Thisis
alsoarangetypequestions.Thehighestanswersarebetween3and5asthenumberofthe
respondentsarethesamewhichis22andthepercentagesare34percent.Thelowestanswer
is2percentasonlyonerespondentchoseit.

Figure 5 above shows the responses for Q5

Ourfifthquestionisthat,weaskedtherespondentstoticktheexamplesofWeb2.0tools
theyhaveused.OutoftenchoicesthatwegivethemSlideshare,Wallwisher,Weebly,
Wikipedia,Prezi,Bubbl.us,Flickr,Mindomo,Project.me,GoogleDocs,thehighestWeb2.0
toolsthattherespondentshaveexperienceinusingitis,GoogleDocs,whichiswith77
percent,followedbySlidesharewhichis73percent.WikipediaisalsothemostusedWeb2.0
toolsamongtherespondentswhichis66percent.52percentofrespondentshavechosen
Weebly,meanwhile,45percentofthemhaveusedPrezi.Otherthanthat,27percentofthe
respondentshavepickedFlickrasoneoftheWeb2.0toolsthattheyfamiliarwith.Besides,
Present.meisthesecondlowestWeb2.0toolsthattherespondentshaveused,withonly20
percent,followedbythethelowestWeb2.0toolswhichareBubbl.usandWallwisher.

Figure 6 above shows the responses for Q6

MovingontothenextquestionisaboutdotheythinkWeb2.0isconvenientindailylearning
process.Thisisoneofthequestionthatispreparedbyus,aimedtofindouthowmuchWeb

2.0helpsindailyteachingandlearningprocess.Wehaveanalysedtheresultintermsofpie
chartbecauseitisasimpleYesandNoquestion.Overall,majorityoftherespondentsagreed
thatWeb2.0isindeedconvenientindailylearningprocess,with94percent,andfollowedby
6percentofthemdisagreethatusingWeb2.0inlearningprocessisconvenient.

Moreover,wealsoincludedaquestionabouthavetheyrecommendedWeb2.0toanyone.72
percentoftherespondentshaverecommendedusingWeb2.0totheirpeersorjustanyone.
Meanwhile,therestofthem28percentofthemhaveneverrecommendedusingWeb2.0to
anyone.
Movingontothelastquestionofoursurvey.Weaskthemabouttheiropinionsabouthowto
improvetheusageofWeb2.0ineducation.Wemadethisquestionnotcompulsoryto
answer,sowereceived26responsesoutof64.Herearesomeoftheanswersthatthe
respondentsgave.
1. NeedtoprovidemoregoodInternetconnectionsothatthesekindsofeducationcould
bewellmanagedeverytimeneeded.
2. Theusageneedtobeimprovisetoschoolstudents.
3. Flippedlearningisthebestwaytointroduceweb2.0tostudentsastheyhaveto
exploremanythingsbythemselves.Lecturerscangivetheassignmentsbyusing
differentkindsofweb2.0.
4. AlwaystakemoreinitiavetoimprovetheWeb2.0inEducation.
5. Good,mostlyforstudents
6. Goodforlearningprocessandshouldbepromotedworldwide
7. Giveextrasecurity.
8. TheWeb2.0shouldimprovemuchfasterandwiderrangeofinformationcanbe
sharedinsteadofjustonespecificstuff.
9. Canalsobeusedinclass,forteachers
10. UpgradetheapplicationsinsidetheWeb2.0
11. CreateorbuyagadgetthatsupportstheWeb2.0.
12. TeachersshoulduseWeb2.0appsmoreofteninlearningprocessandintroducetothe
studentsaboutthebenefits.

13. EducatorsneedtostarttouseWeb2.0inearlystagestoexposedthechildrensothat
theyhavevarietieswaysoflearning,thuseveryschoolshouldprovidetheproper
toolssothatthisaimwillbeachieved.
14. Shownewkindsofnewguide.
15. Tryinganerrorexperimenting
TherearethreerespondentswhoalsosaidnoneedimprovementonthecurrentuseofWeb
2.0becauseitisactuallydependsonthestudentstostartdoingit,withouthavingtheteachers
tointroducetothem.

Discussions
Fromtheresponsesthatwehavegained,wecansaythatpeoplethinkdifferently.Now,the
discussionbelowwillbrieflytellaboutwhywethinkthatsuchresponsesarereceived.
Forthefirstquestion,mostoftherespondentsknowthetruemeaningofWeb2.0probably
becausetheyhaveencountereditsomewhere.Inouropinion,theteachersinschoolhave
introducedaboutWeb2.0inschool.
Besides,thesecondquestiontellsushowtherespondentsdiscoveredaboutWeb2.0andmost
ofthemfoundoutfromfriendsorcolleagues.Webelievethatthisisbecause,therespondents
spentmoretimewiththeirfriendsmorethananythingandanyone.Surprisingly,thelowestis
frommedia,whereaswethoughttheywilllearnmorefrommediaandInternetsites.
Ontheotherhand,thenextquestionisaboutthefrequencyonhowmuchtheyuseWeb2.0
perweekandwefoundthatmajorityofthemusesitquitefrequentlywhichis5timesper
week.Thisisprobablybecausetheyspentmoretimeonthelaptopandgoingoverthe
Internet.Eventually,theywillgetexposedtoitbitbybit.
Moreover,thefourthquestionarangeofhowmuchtheythinkWeb2.0contributesin
MalaysiaEducation.Mostofthemgavearateof5,andinourownopinion,wethinkthatthis
methodhasbeenintroducedtothemsincetheywereinsecondaryschool.Theyprobably
haveseenthegoodresultintheirexamination,andusingWeb2.0probablyhashelpedthem
alot.

Forquestions5,mostoftherespondentsknowoftheexamplesofWeb2.0applicationsthat
werelisted.Maybe,itisbecauseoftheusageofthoseapplicationsintheireducation.
Questions6statedabouttheconvenientofWeb2.0indailylearningprocessasmanyagreed
toit.Itisbecausetheycanlearnsomethingnewwiththoseapplicationsthatwereabletohelp
themintheirwork.
Itseemsthat,almostmostofthemhaverecommendedWeb2.0towardseveryonebecauseof
theirfamiliarityoftheapplications.ItisalsobecausethatWeb2.0canhelpthemdoingtheir
work.
ManyoftheopinionsregardingonhowtoimprovetheusageofWeb2.0ineducationare
that,theuseofWeb2.0shouldbeinstillinthelearningandteachingclasses.Itisprobably
becauseofthegoodresultsonusingtheapplicantsofWeb2.0thatboostuptheir
performance.
Conclusion
Toconclude,wefoundoutthatWeb2.0iswidelyknownandusefultoallkindofstudents
nomatterinprimary,secondaryschooloruniversitystudents.MalaysiaEducationis
instillingtheproperuseofWeb2.0fortheeducationpurposes.ImprovingtheusageofWeb
2.0ineducationwillresultsinproducingexcellentstudents.

References
MartynShuttleworth.2009.WritingMethodology(atastalian)
https://explorable.com/writingmethodology

MichelleRogersEstable.2014.Web2.0UseinHigherEducation.EuropeanJournalof
Open,DistanceandeLearning17(2)(atastalian)
http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2014/RogersEstable.pdf

You might also like