pgsql-hackers since 2004-10-12 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Oct. 12, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: Unit testing Neil Conway 00:32
Re: Unit testing Neil Conway 00:39
Re: Unit testing Tom Lane 00:51
Re: Unit testing Gavin Sherry 00:55
Re: CVS fixed ... Marc G. Fournier 00:56
Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Greg Stark 00:57
Re: Unit testing Gavin Sherry 01:04
Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Bruce Momjian 01:06
Re: Unit testing Tom Lane 01:07
Re: CVS fixed ... Tom Lane 01:12
Re: minor code question: portal memory cxts 📎 Neil Conway 01:50
Re: CVS fixed ... Heikki Linnakangas 06:27
Re: Making rpath a bit more flexible Peter Eisentraut 06:56
Re: PL/PgSQL for counting all rows in all tables. Dave Page 07:22
Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Magnus Hagander 07:51
Re: [HACKERS] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib Jason Tishler 11:30
Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Greg Stark 12:01
Re: Making rpath a bit more flexible Tom Lane 13:42
Re: Making rpath a bit more flexible Andrew Dunstan 13:43
Re: CVS fixed ... Marc G. Fournier 14:20
Re: postgres vulnerability Dave Cramer 16:33
Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Reini Urban 16:34
Re: CVS fixed ... Reini Urban 16:37
Re: postgres vulnerability Stephan Szabo 16:46
Re: [HACKERS] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib Reini Urban 17:04
Cannot build latest snapshot under Mingw Dann Corbit 17:12
Strange code in initdb Peter Eisentraut 18:29
Required permissions for data directory 📎 Joshua D. Drake 18:51
Re: Required permissions for data directory Tom Lane 19:09
Re: Strange code in initdb Tom Lane 19:14
Re: Required permissions for data directory Andrew Dunstan 19:18
Re: Required permissions for data directory 📎 Joshua D. Drake 19:22
Re: Required permissions for data directory 📎 Joshua D. Drake 19:24
Re: Required permissions for data directory Tom Lane 19:26
Re: Required permissions for data directory Tom Lane 19:31
Re: Cannot build latest snapshot under Mingw Magnus Hagander 19:46
Re: Cannot build latest snapshot under Mingw Dann Corbit 19:50
Re: Required permissions for data directory 📎 Joshua D. Drake 19:53
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Josh Berkus 20:04
Re: Hypothetical Indexes Dann Corbit 20:10
Re: PL/PgSQL for counting all rows in all tables. Robert Treat 20:21
Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Bruce Momjian 20:33
Re: PL/PgSQL for counting all rows in all tables. Rod Taylor 20:33
Re: PL/PgSQL for counting all rows in all tables. Andreas Pflug 20:48
Re: Hypothetical Indexes Tom Lane 21:02
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Greg Stark 21:09
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Tom Lane 21:10
Re: Required permissions for data directory Greg Stark 21:18
Re: Required permissions for data directory Andreas Pflug 21:59
Re: [HACKERS] Need for DLLINIT in Makefile.shlib Bruce Momjian 22:19
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Gaetano Mendola 22:28

Oct. 13, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] PGPASSWORD and client tools Bruce Momjian 00:53
Re: Question about Parser() Neil Conway 04:05
Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Leeuw van der, Tim 06:32
Re: PL/PgSQL for counting all rows in all tables. Dave Page 07:45
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Neil Conway 08:12
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 08:24
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN 📎 Bruce Momjian 10:21
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Hannu Krosing 11:51
Re: [HACKERS] open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Reini Urban 12:03
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Reini Urban 12:21
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN Reini Urban 12:28
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Tom Lane 14:19
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN Reini Urban 14:33
Re: Hypothetical Indexes Marcos A Vaz Salles 14:42
Two-phase commit security restrictions Heikki Linnakangas 15:13
Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction status" Tom Lane 16:18
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Tom Lane 16:35
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions David Garamond 16:58
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Josh Berkus 17:05
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Tom Lane 18:03
Re: Hypothetical Indexes Josh Berkus 18:13
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Alvaro Herrera 18:20
Re: open item: tablespace handing in pg_dump/pg_restore Magnus Hagander 19:11
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Peter Eisentraut 19:18
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Heikki Linnakangas 19:26
Re: more dirmod CYGWIN Bruce Momjian 21:07
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Oliver Jowett 21:26
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Josh Berkus 21:39
implementing another hash join... Martha Chronopoulou 21:48
pgsql: Fix breakage in hashjoin from recent backpatch of left-join bug Tom Lane 21:56
Re: implementing another hash join... Tom Lane 22:28

Oct. 14, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Jan Wieck 00:49
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Jan Wieck 00:52
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage in hashjoin from recent Tatsuo Ishii 02:32
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions David Garamond 02:45
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Oliver Jowett 03:14
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Greg Stark 03:52
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage in hashjoin from recent Tom Lane 03:55
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Jan Wieck 04:17
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Greg Stark 04:22
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Jan Wieck 04:29
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions David Garamond 05:00
Re: Two-phase commit security restrictions Oliver Jowett 05:21
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction status" Michael Paesold 06:17
embedded postgresql gevik 07:49
Networking feature for postgresql... Katsaros Kwn/nos 07:54
Embedded postgresql gevik 07:58
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD 08:09
Re: Networking feature for postgresql... Richard Huxton 08:15
Re: Networking feature for postgresql... Katsaros Kwn/nos 08:36
Re: Embedded postgresql David Garamond 08:57
Re: Networking feature for postgresql... Richard Huxton 08:57
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction status" Alvaro Herrera 13:00
plperl Safe restrictions Andrew Dunstan 19:09
Re: Problem with CIDR data type restrictions Bruce Momjian 19:26
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Jon Jensen 19:31
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Andrew Dunstan 19:44
Re: plperl Safe restrictions David Helgason 19:46
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Jon Jensen 19:51
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Kevin Brown 20:25
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1270: stack overflow in thread in fe_getauthname Bruce Momjian 20:30
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 21:08
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Alvaro Herrera 21:18
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Simon Riggs 22:36
Re: [BUGS] BUG #1270: stack overflow in thread in fe_getauthname Peter Davie 22:56
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Josh Berkus 23:57

Oct. 15, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem Timothy D. Witham 00:09
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Christopher Browne 00:10
Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 Abhijit Menon-Sen 01:50
Re: Strange code in initdb 📎 Bruce Momjian 04:24
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 05:13
Re: Networking feature for postgresql... Katsaros Kwn/nos 07:15
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Simon Riggs 07:55
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Kevin Brown 09:19
Re: Strange code in initdb Peter Eisentraut 12:15
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some Alan Stange 12:53
Re: Hypothetical Indexes Marcos A Vaz Salles 13:13
Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 Merlin Moncure 14:00
get_progname and .exe suffix Andrew Dunstan 14:06
Re: get_progname and .exe suffix Dave Page 14:12
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Tom Lane 15:16
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Tom Lane 15:18
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Tom Lane 15:27
Re: plperl Safe restrictions 📎 Andrew Dunstan 15:27
Re: Strange code in initdb Bruce Momjian 16:08
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Andrew Dunstan 16:18
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access transaction Gaetano Mendola 16:39
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 16:48
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Yann Michel 16:49
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability Bruce Momjian 16:57
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Tom Lane 17:27
CSS 📎 Nurlan M. Mukhanov 18:02
Re: plperl Safe restrictions Andrew Dunstan 18:53
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Simon Riggs 19:42
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Josh Berkus 19:44
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Josh Berkus 20:13
Re: First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... Sean Chittenden 20:16
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 20:34
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Josh Berkus 20:38
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 21:27
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Mark Wong 21:32
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Tom Lane 21:44
Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Mark Wong 22:10

Oct. 16, 2004

Thread Author Time
Nearing final release? Bruce Momjian 03:38
Re: Nearing final release? Tatsuo Ishii 05:30
Re: Networking feature for postgresql... Katsaros Kwn/nos 10:40
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access Neil Conway 13:45
PL/Python: How do I use result methods? Oliver Elphick 14:34
Re: Why we still see some reports of "could not access Tom Lane 16:20
Re: [HACKERS] Networking feature for postgresql... Joe Conway 16:48
Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Tom Lane 16:54
Re: PL/Python: How do I use result methods? Michael Fuhr 16:56
win32 pg_autovacuum make error Andrew Dunstan 20:22
Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Magnus Hagander 20:38
Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Tom Lane 20:52
Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Josh Berkus 21:18
Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Tom Lane 21:19
Re: Nearing final release? Dave Page 21:32
Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact_Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Josh Berkus 21:36
Re: Nearing final release? Greg Stark 21:42
Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Matthew T. O'Connor 21:55
Re: win32 pg_autovacuum make error Tom Lane 22:22
Re: Nearing final release? Tom Lane 22:41
Re: Nearing final release? Dann Corbit 23:04

Oct. 17, 2004

Thread Author Time
Re: Nearing final release? Sean Chittenden 00:23
Re: Nearing final release? Bruce Momjian 00:29
Re: Nearing final release? Bruce Momjian 00:31
Re: Nearing final release? Greg Stark 05:10
additional GCC warnings Neil Conway 12:22
Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan 12:25
Re: 7.4 changes Andrew Dunstan 13:08
spinlocks: generalizing "non-locking test" Neil Conway 13:16
Re: Nearing final release? Tom Lane 17:19
Re: additional GCC warnings Tom Lane 17:50
Re: 7.4 changes Tom Lane 17:52
Re: spinlocks: generalizing "non-locking test" Tom Lane 18:13
Open Items Bruce Momjian 19:07
strange result from contrib/seg regression on windows Andrew Dunstan 19:35
Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) simon 19:40
Re: strange result from contrib/seg regression on windows Tom Lane 19:49
Re: Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Tom Lane 20:12
Re: Open Items Tom Lane 21:20
Re: strange result from contrib/seg regression on windows Andrew Dunstan 21:44
Re: plans for bitmap indexes? Mark Kirkwood 21:51
DETERMINISTIC as synonym for IMMUTABLE Troels Arvin 21:56
tsearch2 regression test path problem Andrew Dunstan 21:56
Re: DETERMINISTIC as synonym for IMMUTABLE Tom Lane 22:08
Re: tsearch2 regression test path problem Tom Lane 22:13
Re: DETERMINISTIC as synonym for IMMUTABLE Troels Arvin 22:24

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31