pgsql-hackers before 2015-09-25 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Sept. 23, 2015

Thread Author Time
Re: a funnel by any other name Robert Haas 01:34
Re: planstate_tree_walker oversight CustomScan Robert Haas 01:43
Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Alvaro Herrera 01:55
Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Peter Geoghegan 01:57
Re: a funnel by any other name Alvaro Herrera 02:14
Re: Parallel Seq Scan Kouhei Kaigai 02:28
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Charles Clavadetscher 02:36
Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 📎 Amir Rohan 04:11
Re: PATCH: use foreign keys to improve join estimates v1 📎 David Rowley 05:11
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr 06:24
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr 06:27
Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Zhaomo Yang 07:11
Re: Parallel Seq Scan 📎 Amit Kapila 07:22
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr 09:40
Inconsistency in Output function of MergeJoin 📎 Amit Kapila 09:56
Re: Parallel Seq Scan Amit Kapila 10:22
Re: 9.5: Can't connect with PGSSLMODE=require on Windows Michael Paquier 12:10
Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Jeevan Chalke 13:18
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Tom Lane 13:21
Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Alvaro Herrera 13:29
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Alvaro Herrera 13:34
Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund 13:36
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr 13:40
Re: a funnel by any other name Simon Riggs 13:57
Re: a funnel by any other name Simon Riggs 13:59
Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Tom Lane 13:59
Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Tom Lane 14:27
Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs Robert Haas 14:44
Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches Robert Haas 14:48
Re: Inconsistency in Output function of MergeJoin Robert Haas 14:52
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas 14:59
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost 15:05
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas 15:11
Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches Alvaro Herrera 15:22
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost 15:24
Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches Robert Haas 15:46
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas 15:49
Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Stephen Frost 15:53
Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas 16:00
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost 16:01
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas 16:17
Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs Peter Eisentraut 16:26
Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas 16:37
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Peter Eisentraut 16:37
Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs Robert Haas 16:43
Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? 📎 Tom Lane 16:45
Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Zhaomo Yang 17:53
Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Alvaro Herrera 18:03
No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Kam Lasater 18:18
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Alvaro Herrera 18:23
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Kam Lasater 18:30
Re: Parallel Seq Scan Robert Haas 18:30
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 18:33
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost 18:39
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Robert Haas 18:43
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Robert Haas 18:45
Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund 18:48
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost 18:52
Re: CREATE POLICY and RETURNING Stephen Frost 18:54
Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Alvaro Herrera 18:57
Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work Andres Freund 19:00
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Alvaro Herrera 19:07
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost 19:20
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Peter Eisentraut 19:22
clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query 📎 Robert Haas 19:38
Re: unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK Stephen Frost 19:41
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Joshua D. Drake 19:47
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Joshua D. Drake 19:47
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus 19:55
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus 20:04
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 20:07
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Thomas Kellerer 20:12
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Alvaro Herrera 20:29
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane 20:31
Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements Jim Nasby 20:41
Re: Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements 📎 Jim Nasby 20:43
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Kam Lasater 20:58
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 21:00
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Jeff Janes 21:09
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Szymon Lipiński 21:10
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Alvaro Herrera 21:14
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! David G. Johnston 21:14
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Alvaro Herrera 21:19
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! David G. Johnston 21:25
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tom Lane 21:25
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Robert Haas 21:29
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane 21:39
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 21:40
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Jim Nasby 22:05
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Adam Brightwell 22:22
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Jim Nasby 22:27
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Tom Lane 22:30
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query 📎 Robert Haas 23:10
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane 23:25
Re: Bad row estimation with indexed func returning bool 📎 Tom Lane 23:30
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus 23:33
Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Robert Haas 23:57

Sept. 24, 2015

Thread Author Time
Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Tom Lane 00:11
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Thomas Munro 00:21
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Joe Conway 01:31
Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Amir Rohan 02:26
Re: Parallel Seq Scan 📎 Robert Haas 02:33
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Alvaro Herrera 02:41
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Thomas Munro 05:25
Re: Postgres - BDR issue Craig Ringer 05:29
Re: PATCH: use foreign keys to improve join estimates v1 📎 David Rowley 05:41
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Thomas Kellerer 06:20
Re: Spurious standby query cancellations 📎 Jeff Janes 06:33
Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Jeevan Chalke 06:57
Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? Jeevan Chalke 07:36
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Torsten Zuehlsdorff 07:42
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Torsten Zuehlsdorff 07:43
Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 Masahiko Sawada 08:07
Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing Shulgin, Oleksandr 08:23
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tomas Vondra 09:50
Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation Gavin Flower 10:33
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation Geoff Winkless 10:41
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation Gavin Flower 10:52
Re: [Proposal] Table partition + join pushdown 📎 Taiki Kondo 11:06
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 11:25
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 11:26
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Robert Haas 11:51
Re: PATCH: use foreign keys to improve join estimates v1 📎 Tomas Vondra 11:57
Re: 9.5: Can't connect with PGSSLMODE=require on Windows Thom Brown 12:12
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Masahiko Sawada 12:37
pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values. Andres Freund 12:56
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Robert Haas 13:22
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tomas Vondra 13:49
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add pages deleted from pending list to FSM Fujii Masao 13:50
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! ktm@rice.edu 14:28
Re: pg_resetxlog sentences Fujii Masao 14:32
Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work 📎 Andres Freund 14:34
Re: pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values. Tom Lane 14:37
Re: pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values. Andres Freund 14:46
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Andrew Dunstan 14:56
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Robert Haas 15:09
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tom Lane 15:18
Re: ON CONFLICT issues around whole row vars, Andres Freund 15:25
Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics Andres Freund 15:32
Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics Alexander Korotkov 15:36
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Lower *_freeze_max_age minimum values. Alvaro Herrera 15:39
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Robert Haas 15:41
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Andres Freund 15:43
GIN vacuum bug 📎 Teodor Sigaev 15:47
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane 15:54
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Robert Haas 16:03
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Alvaro Herrera 16:04
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane 16:34
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane 16:35
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tomas Vondra 16:40
Re: multivariate statistics / patch v7 Josh Berkus 16:43
Re: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected? 📎 Tom Lane 16:52
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tomas Vondra 16:55
Re: multivariate statistics / patch v7 Tomas Vondra 16:58
Re: jsonb_set array append hack? 📎 Dmitry Dolgov 17:02
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus 17:03
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Fujii Masao 17:03
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tom Lane 17:04
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 17:08
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Joe Conway 17:12
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tomas Vondra 17:15
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Tom Lane 17:16
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 17:24
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus 17:29
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Robert Haas 17:42
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Robert Haas 17:46
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed Tomas Vondra 17:58
Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query Tom Lane 18:08
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Ryan Pedela 18:10
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Greg Stark 18:19
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! David Fetter 18:23
Re: Parallel Seq Scan 📎 Amit Kapila 18:31
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 19:19
Re: pgsql: RLS refactoring 📎 Stephen Frost 19:43
Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses 📎 Stephen Frost 19:45
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Tom Lane 19:55
Re: row_security GUC, BYPASSRLS Noah Misch 20:06
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stephen Frost 20:07
Re: Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses Tom Lane 20:08
Re: PGXS "check" target forcing an install ? Noah Misch 20:21
Re: Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses Tom Lane 20:25
Decimal64 and Decimal128 Feng Tian 20:29
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Feng Tian 20:31
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Peter Geoghegan 20:35
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Tom Lane 20:53
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Peter Geoghegan 20:55
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Feng Tian 21:17
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Feng Tian 21:23
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Stefan Kaltenbrunner 21:32
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Josh Berkus 21:45
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 David Rowley 21:50
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Thomas Munro 21:57
Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Jim Nasby 22:01
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Jim Nasby 22:25
Re: 9.3.9 and pg_multixact corruption Jim Nasby 22:27
Re: 9.3.9 and pg_multixact corruption Alvaro Herrera 22:30
Re: Bad row estimation with indexed func returning bool Tom Lane 22:38
Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! Tom Lane 22:40
Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 Josh Berkus 22:53
Re: Rename withCheckOptions to insertedCheckClauses Dean Rasheed 23:14

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30